@mjangelvortex
This is just getting ridiculous with the fetish tags now. We do not need every single possible thing that can be done to someone to have a fetish tag associated with it whose purpose is to filter not even by content but by the assumed intentions of the creation of the image, and with media on television exempt even when we’d strongly suspect non-innocent intentions (not a big problem with EqG but comes up if you splice together a Totally Spies segment into something pony).
It runs completely counter to every aspect of how tagging should work.
Also, all of the images under that artist are rated Safe, so they’re still “SFW”, and I am quite certain they do not need a ratings change for an action that has nothing to do with sexuality.
Anyways, do you
really have a need to filter these images or is this speculative? Cause I can get like, filtering images of nasty feet being shown off, but…characters being put into bags?
I’d say complex filter using the “fetish” tag, but I’m really thinking even tagging these “fetish” is going too far cause like, there is nothing in these images indicating it’s sexual in nature and all we have is a guess based on the artist repeating similar setups in the images, which could be just autism instead of a fetish.