Posts

Search Results

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 35

tyto4tme4l

Something of an artist

We have both generator:bing image creator and generator:dall-e 3, but Bing Image Creator currently uses DALL-E 3. Shouldn’t some kind of implication or alias be present here? I’m not sure what exactly, since it might change in the future.
generator:easyfluff v11.2 is a model run on Stable Diffusion, shouldn’t it imply generator:stable diffusion?
Wouldn’t it be better to change some tag prefixes from “generator” to “model”? Like in generator:easyfluff v11.2 or generator:pony diffusion v5.

Posted 4 months ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 34

Ciaran

Senior Moderator

友情は魔法だ

@SweetAI Belle
Ok, thank you. But, essentially, short of doing necromancy, I need an object to attach the tag to in the database. As soon as images using it show up, we can document the tag then.

Posted 11 months ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 33

SweetAI Belle

Not a Dictionary

@Ciaran
They announced adding it to the beta version of photoshop today, so this was just being proactive. Enough people use photoshop that I expect we will start seeing it, but I don’t know of any images with it yet on the site.

Posted 11 months ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 32

Ciaran

Senior Moderator

友情は魔法だ

@SweetAI Belle
I really need at least one image on the site with the tag to do the stuff. Are you aware of any? Or is that a future us thing?

Posted 11 months ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 31

SweetAI Belle

Not a Dictionary

It might be a good idea to add adobe firefly to the list of generators. It seems like it’s being added to beta versions of photoshop now, so I expect it may start cropping up…

Posted 11 months ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 30

Ciaran

Senior Moderator

友情は魔法だ

@Background Pony #5ACC - Done.
@PUBLIQclopAccountant - Done.

Posted 11 months ago Report
Edited 11 months ago

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 29

Background Pony #5ACC

@PUBLIQclopAccountant
Because it has more than a handful of uses and people might have been watching/filtering the tag, it should definitely be aliased, not just manually retagged.

Posted 11 months ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 28

🐴

IRL 🎠 stallion

This may be a better place than the artist tag alias thread for this post.

Per the new AI policy, generated by Cloppermania should be renamed to prompter:cloppermania. I can use the tag edit userscript to rack up some metadata edits if staff is too busy to make this change soon.

Posted 11 months ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 27

Background Pony #5ACC

@Ciaran
Thanks.

This one also still needs doing:
@Background Pony #5ACC

imgcreator imply-> machine learning generated

It’s been retagged by hand to generator:imgcreator so imgcreator should be aliased to that, and it needs implications still.

Posted 11 months ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 26

Ciaran

Senior Moderator

友情は魔法だ

@Background Pony #5ACC - Done. Thank you for finding that. I missed it.

@Background Pony #5ACC - Done.

Posted 11 months ago Report
Edited 11 months ago

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 25

Background Pony #5ACC

lucidpony: sd is magic 2 imply-> stable diffusion, ai content

Posted 11 months ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 24

Background Pony #5ACC

pony diffusion v4 <-> pony diffusion <-> ponydiffusion

fluffusion

all: imply-> stable diffusion, machine learning generated

Posted 11 months ago Report
Edited 11 months ago

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 23

Ciaran

Senior Moderator

友情は魔法だ

@PUBLIQclopAccountant
The artist tag will always be much more important than that information, but we don’t delete images because they don’t have artist tags. We just ask for them, or try to find them.

If someone is scraping Discord or Twitter for AI images and tagging them badly, they’re more likely to be deleted for Rule #3.

Posted about a year ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 22

🐴

IRL 🎠 stallion

@Background Pony #AA1D
I agree that the prompt should be required where available. However, I don’t want images banned because someone went scraping Discord or Twitter for AI images that did not have prompts attached.

Posted about a year ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 21

Background Pony #5ACC

imgcreator imply-> machine learning generated

Posted about a year ago Report
Edited about a year ago

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 20

Mildgyth

Senior Moderator

Humata, Hukhta, Hvarshta

Done.

Posted about a year ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 19

Background Pony #5ACC

pinegraph imply-> machine learning generated

Posted about a year ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 18

Mildgyth

Senior Moderator

Humata, Hukhta, Hvarshta

Done.

Posted about a year ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 17

Background Pony #5ACC

Another model I guess
anything pony: sd is magic imply-> stable diffusion, machine learning generated

Posted about a year ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 16

Mildgyth

Senior Moderator

Humata, Hukhta, Hvarshta

@Background Pony #5ACC

Done.

Posted about a year ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 15

Background Pony #5ACC

novel ai alias-> novelai (the service’s name is written without a space)
novelai imply-> machine learning generated, stable diffusion

Posted about a year ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 14

Background Pony #AA1D

Since we require the image uploader to tag the artist and provide a source, should we require them to tag the machine learning system which generated the image and provide the prompt, respectively? This is of course about machine learning generated, not machine learning assisted images.

Posted 1 years ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 13

Background Pony #5ACC

@Background Pony #AA1D
edit, editor:*, and write in the description what has been done. Other than that, I don’t know.

Posted 1 years ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 12

Background Pony #AA1D

@Background Pony #5ACC
Then how should we tag slightly corrected AI images? It’s useful to tell them apart from raw AI images in order not to overestimate the abilities of a given AI.

Posted 1 years ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » Thread about tags for various "AI" image generators » Post 11

Background Pony #5ACC

@Background Pony #AA1D
IMO, “substantial”. Whatever that means.

I’d make a first try to define that as there being concrete enough portions of the image that you could state, “X part of the image was neither generated by an AI nor handmade for the purpose of correcting AI artifacts/errors, and that part is not a trifling part like an earring.”

How to judge that line in terms of significant hands-on manipulation, cutting/compositing, creation of underlying images fed into “img2img” functions, etc. I’m still quite uncertain about.

Posted 1 years ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Default search

If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.

Allowed fields

Field Selector	Type	Description	Example
`author`	Literal	Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term.	`author:Joey`
`body`	Full Text	Matches the body of this post. This is the default field.	`body:test`
`created_at`	Date/Time Range	Matches the creation time of this post.	`created_at:2015`
`id`	Numeric Range	Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post.	`id:1000000`
`my`	Meta	`my:posts` matches posts you have posted if you are signed in.	`my:posts`
`subject`	Full Text	Matches the title of the topic.	`subject:time wasting thread`
`topic_id`	Literal	Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to.	`topic_id:7000`
`topic_position`	Numeric Range	Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0.	`topic_position:0`
`updated_at`	Date/Time Range	Matches the creation or last edit time of this post.	`updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago`
`user_id`	Literal	Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term.	`user_id:211190`
`forum`	Literal	Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to.	`forum:meta`