Posts

For more information, see the search syntax documentation. Search results are sorted by creation date.

Search Results

Tagging Discussion » Some dress implications » Post 2

Roseluck
Roseluck - For supporting the site

@Litrojia  
Thank you.
 
Originally had a last line: “this would need some cleanup though. (examples not exhaustive)”
 
Wiktionary says a LBD is only “often” quite short and can also refer to any black dress that’s “simple, versatile, and elegant.” That leaves room for non-short LBDs.
 
But as far as tags are concerned, I feel that browsing for a little black dress that’s not also a short dress amounts to browsing for just black dress. So I’m for the short dress implication and cleaning up the inconsistent pictures.
 
Never actually checked little black dress before I had my own entry though. So grain of salt.

Tagging Discussion » Some dress implications » Post 1

Litrojia
Cottonwood Kindle - For supporting the site
Pixel Perfection - Hot Pockets Spotted
Solar Guardian - Refused to surrender in the face of the Lunar rebellion and showed utmost loyalty to the Solar Empire (April Fools 2023).
Tree of Harmony -
Elements of Harmony - Had an OC in the 2022 Community Collab
Non-Fungible Trixie -
Artistic Detective - For hunting down artist when their names have changed
Happy Derpy! - For site supporters
Bronze Supporter - Bronze Supporter
Verified Pegasus - Show us your gorgeous wings!

Added the first two implications. With the last one though, at least by the way they’re tagged, the little black dresses on the site aren’t always short. I’m not sure though if little black dresses aren’t short by definition, or if it’s just inconsistent tagging.

Tagging Discussion » Some dress implications » Topic Opener

Default search

If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.

Allowed fields

Field SelectorTypeDescriptionExample
authorLiteralMatches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term.author:Joey
bodyFull TextMatches the body of this post. This is the default field.body:test
created_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation time of this post.created_at:2015
idNumeric RangeMatches the numeric surrogate key for this post.id:1000000
myMetamy:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. my:posts
subjectFull TextMatches the title of the topic.subject:time wasting thread
topic_idLiteralMatches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to.topic_id:7000
topic_positionNumeric RangeMatches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0.topic_position:0
updated_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation or last edit time of this post.updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago
user_idLiteralMatches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term.user_id:211190
forumLiteralMatches the short name for the forum this post belongs to.forum:meta