Posts

@Ciaran
OK, thanks, good to know.

[edit] and then I saw the next page of the thread

@Ciaran
Yeaaaaahhh it was… totally intentional to free up the user’s slots! For sure!

@saby
Oh, I thought it was intentional to free up the user’s slots. Either way, the report is still running. I’m currently crawling through potential Rule #1 stuff.

@Background Pony #699F
That was an oopsie misclick by yours truly, I remade the report to keep the issue from being dismissed, and it’s been claimed by another staff member. Sorry for the trouble, eh?

@Background Pony #699F
It was duplicated to a new report to free up your report slots, while I dig into what is happening behind the scenes. That report actually has a lot of moving parts.

I made a report recently about some images using vectors without crediting the vectors’ artists, and also asking if the “artist:” tag related to the source account should instead be an “editor:” tag. The report was closed, and no changes on the reported images’ tags were made (no artist tags added, no “edit” added). Why?

@saby
Ok thanks. I won’t belabor it any further.

Maybe should have that post removed too. Thank you.

@☬ ᏝᏆᏁᏨᎾᏝᏁᏰᏒᎬᎳᏕᎿᎬᏒᎱᎯᏁ ☬
Sorry, we can’t discuss the identity of accounts. “Member since X years ago” may be counting from a time the account was renamed, but I could be wrong.

@byte[]
Ah ok i see. I thought it was automatic.

@icicle wicicle 1517
That stuff is all done manually, so someone would have to get around to updating it for you.

Does the badge relating to how much money you’ve donated to derpi overall (the gem/element of generosity badges) still get upgraded/updated? (IE still donating using a monthly service like subscribestar/pixv)

Im asking becuase my badge for donating is still on “Sapphire”, and i thought that i would have donated enough to get it to the next “tier” by now X)

@TexasUberAlles
assuming the link is publicly visible

@The Smiling Pony
also thankfully fully automagic

@TexasUberAlles
Thankfully automatic.

Does every user with an artist:____ tag associated with their account automatically get a Recent Artwork section added to their profile page, or is that done by hand?

@saby
Yeah it’s doable. But there no “button” for that. Maybe when @Panko Pai is ready, I’ll use it as an opportunity to document the process for whomever does it in the future.

@Panko Pai
Send me a PM of what you would like please, and I’ll get it set up.

@Panko Pai
Technically it’s possible at least.

Regarding tags:
Can a tag that is currently an alias of another tag be updated to become the current tag, while the original tag becomes an alias?

reasons is that I consider updating my artist tag in the future ^^;

@14Fan
Replied to you via PM :)

How do you post an image into a thread?

Has anyone ever made a graph of images with 99+ comments sorted by when they were posted? Something like (age of image in days / 365) on the x-axis and log(comment_count) on the y.

I have a hunch that images with 100+—and especially—300+ comment chains are predominantly older than 5 years ago (and not because the older images have had five more years to accumulate comments)

@UnderwoodART
You can submit a request to have the descriptions edited by reporting one of the images for “other”.

I can’t find any written policy on this, so I’ll ask here: if someone had uploaded your art but you want to edit the description, how do you go about “taking control” of the upload? I remember it being mentioned as possible a while ago, but that’s all. Is it a hassle? Can you do it in bulk, or only one at a time?
It’s not the end of the world, I just like to link together related images, and the others in this set were uploaded by someone else before I had an account. If it’s a pain, I’ll live.

Dear mods!

Could you please add links to other panels into description of this image? >>1014945
panel 1 >>3100805 panel 2 (you are here) panel 3 >>3100812 panel 4 >>3100814
I’ve uploaded all four panels in a row few days ago, but didn’t notice that second one was already here, so it got merged and now it’s out of order and need links in description for easier navigation.

Upd:
Okay, I see you did it. Thanks!

@TexasUberAlles
I think JP’s post may square the circle of AI-assisted vs. pure ML-generated: if there’s enough human intervention to warrant an artist tag, then it’s probably fine to count. If it’s pure AI or AI that’s only been touched up (and not a transformative work), then it’s zeroed out.

IMO, there’s a higher likelihood of substantially-edited AI art having artistic merit than 99% of edited screencaps (where the edit is often adding dialogue or fetish nonsense)

@JP
make it so that only images with an artist tag count
This, yes.

@LightningBolt
AI and screencaps excluded from upload credit would be great, as would tagging added for sure
Also this. The site already had a problem with page after page of low quality screencaps of unimportant and uninteresting scenes.