@mjangelvortex
@Mildgyth
Changelings, I agree, are probably dependent on magic for flight like pegasi are. Especially before their reformation, those hole-punched wings of theirs couldn’t possibly keep them aloft on their own.
I disagree about the dragons, though, largely because of how big, bulky and armor-plated they’re portrayed as. Take Torch – he’s bulky, muscular and absolutely gigantic, likely enormously heavy, and his wingspan is proportionally very small, too small to keep him aloft by itself.
Weight is a big factor in whether something can stay airborne, as is the lift provided by the wings. Flying animals, especially big ones, need to make sure they’re as light as possible to keep themselves in the air. With real-life flyers, a consistent trend is that the really big ones – albatrosses, condors, extinct animals like
teratorns and giant pterosaurs – tend to have both very slight bodies, which in addition to things like large air sacs and hollow bones keep their weight down, and huge, broad wings several times wider than the rest of their body. Dragons, I think, would require some degree of magic to counteract their weight. They may still be able to fly or glide without it, but probably not very well.
Considering the degree of physical variation that seems typical of dragons, though, I could see different individuals being more or less dependent on magic to fly. Torch likely cannot fly under muscle power alone, he’s way too big, but it may be that more slender and large-winged dragons might.
@mjangelvortex
Griffons and Hippogriffs seem to have pretty big wings too so maybe they can fly naturally too. I kinda like the idea that outside of walking on clouds that Gryphons are like “muggles” in the MLP universe so they don’t have much (if any) natural outside of that.
This sounds likely enough. Griffons do have proportionally much bigger wings than pegasi do, and they’ve never been portrayed as a particularly “magical” race.