@TexasUberAlles
In those cases you can enter just a few letters of the tag name to narrow the search down. That would probably be even more accurate than alphabetical given just
how many tags there are.
Think of it this way:
Sort them alphabetically: You’re able to have a better idea of which page to start at, or at least can start on the first page containing that letter. But there is still 1,110 pages of tags. So just listing alphabetically doesn’t narrow down
that much.
Current: type in either one of the words, or a few of the letters if you can’t remember the spelling, receive a list of
only the tags that contain that word/combination of letters.
Possibly we could add alphabetizing to it and that might narrow things down even further. But I’m having trouble seeing how that may actually help find something given the sheer number of tags there are.
Plus: Being listed by number of images they’re on lets you know which tags are actually in use, so you know that if you’re looking at the tags that have only 10, 15, or so images under them, you might be looking at the wrong tag.