@Millennial Dan
Who said this was sexualized? Lesbian doesn’t always mean NSFW. Now I know the Site Administrator said it’s not shipping, but I still say it is, but I won’t add the tag so I don’t start shit.
Besides holding hands, and the little blush on their faces typically found in drawings of young people, i see no intention of shipping in this image. The artist itself didnt tag his/her work with any “ship” tag on DA, and the description doesn’t point to a romantic relationship of sorts.
So unless the artist states otherwise, this shall no have any shipping tags.
@Background is Best Pony
What for? Why is anybody even trying to sexualize minors in an image like this in the first place? Do you seriously think a couple of children holding hands before they cross the street warrants a “lesbian” tag? This is getting really ridiculous.
@Millennial Dan
Well I knew what I was talking about back then. I thought girls were pretty, and I was atracted to them, and I even had a few girlfriends way back then. (Ironnically now not so much…) So yes it is possible for kids to be atracted to someone else.
Why do people keep removing the shipping and FlutterDash tags? This is clearly shipping. I mean, I get that holding hands isn’t necessarily romantic, but their reactions to it implies that it’s meant to be taken that way.
@Godzelda123
Bro, there was a girl I knew that I thought I’d marry someday when I was five… but it was not a crush, and I did not know what I was talking about back then. For kids, it’s just innocent “We’re really good friends, so we can be a mom and a dad too someday, right?” That kind of stuff. Children aren’t attracted to one another the way shippers mean, and it’s pretty squicky to think they can be.
@QuasarNova
That’s not a counter argument, it’s just weird. Kids know nothing about crushes or romantic attraction. Trying to impose such a thing on them pretty much always comes off as totally wrong, unless they really are just a couple of bungling kids playing pretend, a la Peter Pan and Wendy.
