Uploaded by Background Pony #E8CF
1020x576 PNG 462 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2174438 +-SH edit173002 +-SH edited screencap90462 +-SH screencap295738 +-SH rainbow dash279904 +-SH pegasus496524 +-SH pony1602572 +-SH g42028957 +-SH diverse-mlp-headcanons67 +-SH female1802785 +-SH headcanon3019 +-SH image macro40234 +-SH lidded eyes48029 +-SH mare741085 +-SH meme93896 +-SH solo1426161
Loading...
Loading...
There are Korean Pony
Check your triggers.
Wrong!
I think there were a couple fanfics about “Unicorea”. Heck, I even made a pun once about “King Neighjong the Great, creator of the Unicorean language.”
I mean ponies live in equestria
Tumblr is weird
Modern Day? Is that like a holiday or something?
How do I link you to a page of my confidential medical records?
Also, what does my opinion of that article have to do with the facts of what I am diagnosed with?
Feel free to link me to the page. Meanwhile, tell me your opinion on the link.
Also under the DSM5 I DO have Aspergers.
Tell me your opinion on the link.
>We already established that Asperger’s syndrome was defined a type of autism
THAT WAS THE POINT I WAS MAKING!!
But no, you had to keep going on about how it was not real.
Edited because: R0
We already established that Asperger’s syndrome was defined a type of autism before the diagnosis was absorbed into autism spectrum disorder.
What is your opinion on this?
This change made to diagnoses of autism and Asperger’s has been among the highest profile and most controversial in the new DSM-5. A study, published in April 2012 using a preliminary version of the new DSM-5 autism spectrum criteria found about 75 percent of patients who had been diagnosed with Asperger’s under the old criteria would no longer qualify for a diagnosis, raising the possibility that they could lose access to services, such as special education in schools.
Here is somthing to note, there are three main types of autism.
Pervasive developmental disorder, Autistic disorder, and, hope I don’t loose you here, Asperger’s syndrome.
It;s not just a name, it’s a TYPE of autism.
Edited because: R0
“Second. And bear with me here. Aspergers… is a name. It’s made out of letters. It is a name given for a certain pattern of personality and behavior. The usage of this name to describe certain behaviors is entirely based upon consensus. That consensus can change, and then the meaning of the name changes.”
No, you are the one that is hopeless.
All you keep talking about how it doesn’t exist because in DSM 5 it was removed as a separate diagnosis, ignoring how its was put as part of the autism spectrum.
How does it not being separate from autism means it doesn’t exist at all?
How do I even answer to that? It doesn’t seem like you’re willing to do a debate in good faith. Whenever I describe something you ignore everything I wrote and then claim I said something I didn’t. It’s… hopeless.
It wasn’t a dodge, it’s the root of the whole thing I was asking you.
And now you do a dodge.
First off. Nice dodge.
Second. And bear with me here. Aspergers… is a name. It’s made out of letters. It is a name given for a certain pattern of personality and behavior. The usage of this name to describe certain behaviors is entirely based upon consensus. That consensus can change, and then the meaning of the name changes.
Better question, how does the DSM 5 prove that Aspergers doesn’t exist anymore when it ONLY removed it as a separate diagnosis from autism, it made it part of the autism spectrum.
How does being part of the autism spectrum mean that it not longer exist at all?
Alright. Let’s put my verbal skills to use.
What does:
“As I pointed out MANY time, it only removed it as a separate diagnosis, not that it no longer exist.”
have to do with:
“No. That’s the DSM 5. Your doctor got his diagnoses from the DSM 4 or earlier.”
I see now, you think 1+1+4.
Should I just keep copy pasting this until you understand that your point has nothing to do with what I said?
“DSM 4*”
“Yes, where it was removed as a separate diagnosis and folded into autism spectrum.”
“No. That’s the DSM 5. Your doctor got his diagnoses from the DSM 4 or earlier.”
Ya, you know shit.
As I pointed out MANY time, it only removed it as a separate diagnosis, not that it no longer exist.
That was my point here, it still exist, just as part of the autism spectrum.