Viewing last 25 versions of comment by JayzPoni on image #2102792

JayzPoni

"[@Background Pony #9D5A":](/images/2102792#comment_8331139
)  
I'm not going to change anything but wouldn't this image be implied sparity? Objectively speaking there isn't anything in the image that says that rarity and spike are in a relationship besides whats in the description which is where the implied part comes in. Polyamory does not necessarily mean that all the characters are in a relation ship together, for example, an image such as this https://derpibooru.org/1815792 is not listed as rarijack even though the artist says in the description that they ship rarijack hard.
Reason: Added something, fixed formatting
Edited by JayzPoni
JayzPoni

"@Background Pony #9D5A":/images/2102792#comment_8331139
I'm not going to change anything but wouldn't this image be implied sparity? Objectively speaking there isn't anything in the image that says that rarity and spike are in a relationship besides whats in the description which is where the implied part comes in. Polyamory does not necessarily mean that all the characters are in a relation ship for example, an image such as this
https://derpibooru.org/1815792 is not listed as rarijack even though the artist says in the description that they ship rarijack hard.
Reason: Added something, fixed formatting
Edited by JayzPoni
JayzPoni

"@Background Pony #9D5A":/images/2102792#comment_8331139
I'm not going to change anything but wouldn't this image be implied sparity? Objectively speaking there isn't anything in the image that says that rarity and spike are in a relationship besides whats in the description which is where the implied part comes in. Polyamory does not necessarily mean that all the characters are in a relation ship for example, an image such as this
https://derpibooru.org/1815792 is not listed as rarijack even though the artist says in the description that they ship rarijack hard
Reason: Added something
Edited by JayzPoni
JayzPoni

"@Background Pony #9D5A":/images/2102792#comment_8331139
I'm not going to change anything but wouldn't this image be implied sparity? Objectively speaking there isn't anything in the image that says that rarity and spike are in a relationship besides whats in the description which is where the implied part comes in.
No reason given
Edited by JayzPoni