Viewing last 25 versions of comment by Background Pony #9740 on image #2099045

"[@thetundraterror":](/images/2099045#comment_8319103
)  
You clearly like to speak non sense. In what scenario you are not allowed to make money by drawing something that was already done, if the artist is not "tracing" the piece of art exactly as the original, I see no problem with making money taking reference of something that already exist. So in other words, you wouldn't be allowed to draw a car because you are not the owner of the original design or you wouldn't be allowed to draw the Eiffel tower because of the same reason(Also you wouldn't be allowed to sell a piece of art with a car nor the Eiffel tower using your logic); clearly what you said makes no sense, I don't know in what you believe, but in music it is totally ok to make covers of already existing songs because you are putting your own style on to it, go to youtube and see for yourself how many are the youtubers musicians that are doing covers and making money out of it.

"@thetundraterror":/images/2099045#comment_8319103
You clearly like to speak non sense. In what scenario you are not allowed to make money by drawing something that was already done, if the artist is not "tracing" the piece of art exactly as the original, I see no problem with making money taking reference of something that already exist. So in other words, you wouldn't be allowed to draw a car because you are not the owner of the original design or you wouldn't be allowed to draw the Eiffel tower because of the same reason; clearly what you said makes no sense, I don't know what you believe but in music it is totally ok to make covers of already existing songs because you are putting your own style on to it, go to youtube and see for yourself how many are the youtubers musicians that are doing covers and making money out of it.

"@thetundraterror":/images/2099045#comment_8319103
You clearly like to speak non sense. In what scenario you are not allowed to make money by drawing something that was already done, if the artist is not "tracing" the piece of art exactly as the original, I see no problem with making money taking reference of something that already exist. So in other words, you wouldn't be allowed to draw a car because you are not the owner of the original design or you wouldn't be allowed to draw the Eiffel tower because of the same reason; clearly what you sayid makes no sense, I don't know what you believe but in music it is totally ok to make cover of already existing songs because you are putting your own style on to it, go to youtube and see for yourself how many are the youtubers musicians that are doing covers and making money out of it.

"@thetundraterror":/images/2099045#comment_8319103
You clearly like to speak non sense. In what scenario you are not allowed to make money by drawing something that was already done, if the artist is not "tracing" the piece of art exactly as the original, I see no problem with making money taking reference of something that already exist. So in other words, you wouldn't be allowed to draw a car because you are not the owner of the original design or you wouldn't be allowed to draw the Eiffel tower because of the same reason; clearly what you say makes no sense, I don't know what you believe but in music it is totally ok to make cover of already existing songs because you are putting your own style on to it, go to youtube and see for yourself how many are the youtubers musicians that are doing covers and making money out of it.