Viewing last 25 versions of comment by Narlepoax III on image #1779859

"[@Ferrotter":](/1779859#comment_7300677
)  
Well, if you _*really_* wanna get pedantic, there's no technical difference between the scientaxonomific declassifinications of "monkey" and "ape".


 
So humans can correctly be labelled as either.


"
 
 
[@Cedric Moon":](/1779859#comment_7299966
)  
Also, humans aren't hairless. We actually have more hair follicles per square inch of skin than chimpanzees do. Our hairs are just very thin, short, and colorless; except in specific locations.

"@Ferrotter":/1779859#comment_7300677
Well, if you _really_ wanna get pedantic, there's no technical difference between the scientific definitions of "monkey" and "ape".

So humans can correctly be labelled as either.


"@Cedric Moon":/1779859#comment_7299966
Also, humans aren't hairless. We actually have more hair follicles per square inch of skin than chimpanzees do. Our hairs are just very thin, short, and colorless; except in specific locations.

"@Ferrotter":/1779859#comment_7300677
Well, if you _really_ wanna get pedantic, there's no technical difference between the scientific definitions of "monkey" and "ape".

So humans can correctly be labelled as either.


"@Cedric Moon":/1779859#comment_7299966
Also, humans aren't hairless. We actually have more hair follicles per square inch of skin than chimpanzees do. Our hairs are just very thin, short, and colorless.