Uploaded by Background Pony #3C18
900x1141 PNG 312 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2164815 +-SH artist:lillynya63 +-SH rainbow dash278731 +-SH pegasus492543 +-SH pony1592657 +-SH g42016921 +-SH adventure in the comments1343 +-SH anti-brony154 +-SH background pony strikes again1345 +-SH butthurt189 +-SH comments locked down474 +-SH female1792237 +-SH feminism256 +-SH feminist ponies94 +-SH flying54672 +-SH heart75553 +-SH looking at you257172 +-SH mare734711 +-SH mouthpiece1337 +-SH politics1777 +-SH simple background590641 +-SH solo1417833 +-SH transparent background282520
Loading...
Loading...
@Dsiak
/pol/ slang outside the containment board is the pinnacle of “cringe”. Bro.
The artist
herselfthemself put that. DA link was alive when I uploaded this image.Edited
Based and redpilled
Yeah, you’ve proven to be an honest, unbiased person with infallible memory, so we can just take your word for everything you claim. :P No, this isn’t a “he-said she-said” battle like you claim - we’ve got evidence, and you don’t. That’s all aside from the fact you’ve been trying to twist the conversation away from the actual claim anyway - which is that the show is “feminist”, not “politically motivated”. You talk about feminists being rude, yet you’re the one who started it by claiming I have an unhealthy relationship with fiction when I wasn’t even talking to you, so don’t you even.
I don’t feel the need to site anything because I was there, I was at the conventions, I saw the panels. Repeat your criticisms all you want I never stated anything about what wave of feminism we currently are in or if feminism is inherently bad.
What’s happened here is that people have heard a certain piece of information and I’ve heard a different piece of information. This has happened before it’ll happen again, when it does I’ll tell people what the difference is and we can simply disagree as tends to be the case.
But more often than not somebody else takes that disagreement and makes wild tribalistic assumptions about what my beliefs are beyond thinking the show was not politically motivated.
The only thing I have against feminism is that I have yet to meet a nice feminist. Every time these types of conversations come up it’s always accusations and assumptions, never an honest conversation where two people can simply disagree and walk away. Always insults, always rude language, and always an defensive position in the discussion.
Nothing she said contradicted that, you’re just trying to force (uncited) claims from her to fit your narrative that is at direct odds with reality. Something can be both a show for families AND be made with a feminist agenda in mind. Anyway, your opinions about the aesthetics are based on ignorance and should not be taken seriously. ALL art entails something about the creator’s worldview - otherwise it’s not art, but purely mechanistic drivel.
PS: It’s obvious you don’t know the slightest thing about feminist theory, and are instead just regurgitating anti-feminist garbage - that’s clear by the fact you think we’re in the third wave of feminism rather than the fourth, as that’s a claim anti-feminists frequently make, as well as your obsession with “equity”. In particular, Radical Feminism IS for equality, it’s just based on a more complete understanding of what equality entails that previous forms of feminism. The combination of your lack of understanding and that you cherry pick information about feminists that conform to your anti-feminist ideas doesn’t change that.
People who are active in feminism more accurately show definitions of the movements current ideas and goals than the dictionary is. It’s why there are 4 different waves when you look at the history of movement.
The dictionary does not have a definition for a first, second, or third wave feminism.
What the dictionary does is it takes the entire history of the movement going all the way back to probably 1902 and selects one belief that covers a vast majority of the movements existence.
So if theoretically equality has been the core idea of feminism for the last 87 years and equity has been the core idea for the last 15 years then the dictionary definition is technically accurate but at the same time it doesn’t describe the current movement.
Edited
Unfortunately later statements contradict this. After the show got popular and especially when the spotlight was on the franchise significantly she was asked several times at conventions and interviews if she made a show for girls, and she would say she made a show for families.
So at that point it’s all a matter of what each person chooses to believe, either the show was made with ideological motivations in mind. Or the show was made so that kids would be entertained and parents wouldn’t be pulling their teeth out trying to watch it with their kids.
I’m certain I’m in the minority but I personally view any art with political or ideological motivation in the creative process as less genuine than art made with the sole purpose of being creative and making a story.
Sure, it’s probably every dictionary that’s wrong and you’re the only one who’s right, that seems totally plausible.
In completely unrelated image news,
Current day feminism has absolutely nothing to do with equality. Most ideology based in identity views equality as a failure and instead works toward equity.
Even if you reject the previous statement feminism and the idea of equal treatment aren’t tied together. People can believe in equal treatment and not be feminists.
The key thing to realize is that there is nothing wrong with said feminist agenda, and if you take offense to said agenda than you are exactly the sort of “butthurt brony” that this picture is making fun of.
Cringe and bluepilled ngl
The fact that you think “men and women should be treated equally” is a “political ideology” is why you lost this argument before you even showed up to it.
Just admit you don’t know what feminism is and drop it already.
The creator of the show openly stated multiple times that the show was made for families. It was made with the intention of being something that kids and adults could watch together.
It was never made with the idea of reinforcing a specific political ideology. If people have convinced you of this you were lied to. There have been lots of shows in the last few years that have been made specifically with the motivation and intention of pushing a specific ideology.
This was not one of those shows.
Nah fam, you’re the one obsessively in denial about the feminist elements of a feminist show.
Lol, if you believe that then you might just have an unhealthy relationship with fiction.
Bruh is that a BASED Pokémon Stadium Gengar about to cast OMEGA THUNDERBOLT? Strongest rental next to Starmie ngl
If that’s how you want to view it.
doesnt make me responsible for your poor argumentative skills either
That doesn’t make me responsible for your assumptions.