@Background Pony #FEAB  
You dont need a source for everything in the picture. Just the bulk of the picture its self.

@mycarhasaMoustache  
Then give me the source of all of the cutie marks the symbol’s the bird & the artist who made them.

@Background Pony #FEAB  
@mycarhasaMoustache  
Both of you need to stop right now.  
Those tags are not that important.  
I removed Father/Son/Mother/Daughter since those don’t apply in terms of tagging. But aside form that. Both of you stop.

@Background Pony #FEAB  
Stop changing the source. I reverse searched it and found the EXACT picture and that is a perfectly valid source.  
Im not going away because you are totally abusing the tags.

@mycarhasaMoustache  
nope it dosen’t stop & go away now!

@Background Pony #FEAB  
But if you edited it. Then that makes you the artist. Since you are using an anon account then its impossible to add a proper artist tag for you therefore you dont need “artist needed” Also A quick google search found a source so you dont need source needed anymore either.

@mycarhasaMoustache  
I only count the original source as vaild & i couldn’t find it.

@mycarhasaMoustache  
There are no need for it to be in oder for the tags to stay valid.

@Background Pony #FEAB  
Also if you edited it then the source would be where ever you found it and no artist exists for it on this site.

@Background Pony #FEAB  
The holy spirit is fine the Allegories tag is fine but there is no male, Farther or son, in this picture nor is one implied.

@mycarhasaMoustache  
The Father the Son & the holy sprit is in the picture as alegories.  
I only edited them & i don’t know the source, so all tags stands if you don’t like it go away.

@Background Pony #FEAB  
They are not implied at all. That is not what the tags are for. Also since you made the picture and it is only on this website it does not need the source needed or Artist needed tags either.

@Background Pony #FEAB  
They are not implied at all. Those tags are not referencing religion they are literally for a picture of a father and son. Also since you made the picture and it is only on this website it does not need the source needed or Artist needed tags either.
 
Edit: No Idea why its decided to post this comment twice.

@mycarhasaMoustache  
If you don’t like it just go away & creater your own picture to post & i prommis you i won’t change, add or remove any of them, ok.

@mycarhasaMoustache  
Nope we are = here, she need’s to say that she wither is or isn’t her mother in oder for one of us to be right, untill then we are all = here.  
They are implied stop removing them.

@Chuy Ryu  
That is if Sunset and celestia even exist in Gen 5

@Background Pony #FEAB  
Well considering Princess celestia has only ever referred to Sunset as her student and never made any implication that she is family. My theory has a lot more strength than yours. Also please stop adding completely irreverent tags. There is no Farther or son or males in this picture.

@Chuy Ryu  
That would be so freaking awesome like you have no idea, but i also belive that this is also true for G4 aswell.

@Chuy Ryu  
If that were true, and the iterations are somewhat similar to the predecessors, that’d be awesome.

in gen 5 sunset will be celestia’s actually daughter

ew  
religion that isn’t based on me

@mycarhasaMoustache  
My theory is not waek, your theory is not stong, we are all = here.

@mycarhasaMoustache  
Empirically speaking, their world is controlled by a higher power.
 

@Background Pony #FEAB  
Ok then you can stick with your extremely weak theory despite the massive amounts of evidence against it. However I will look at the facts that are presented to me and make my own judgment and as far as I can tell there is no reason to beleive Sunset is Celestias daughter

@mycarhasaMoustache  
Well, quite. I do agree with you there, but religion can be a fascinating subject of study; after all, it’s been a governing force of humanity throughout history, frequently rivaling the power of the monarchy. But yes, I would agree that self-awareness and being kind is generally a more sensible approach.