@Blissey1
 
leaving out explicit definition huh?
 
well i only pressed on the Explicit tag and got the description i posted in the detailed description and according to that along with the Questionable description when i pressed the questionable tag i would say this picture is Questionable.
 
if there is a even more detailed description of the tags somewhere then i would like to ask for a link towards it please.
 
until then i will view it as questionable

Its explicit.

@Background Pony #42BB  
So in other words, you suck at understanding the site rules

@Keith Mowz  
So in other words, the site rules don’t matter if mods disagree.

@Johnwolf  
Yes, it does matter. You’re being deliberately obtuse, and for no reason as site assistants AND mods have both already stepped in and confirmed that this is explicit.

@Blissey1  
doesn’t matter if Derpybooru already has what tag something like this should be labeled.

@BurningLance  
Gj leaving out the relevant part of the explicit definition that I’ve already quoted earlier in the thread @Blissey1

i think this should be questionable due the description regarding questionable stuff. (copied btw)
 
Detailed description:  
A mostly comprehensive list of questionable things:  
→Visible breast nipples  
→Overt sexual references  
→Barely-covered genitals or anuses  
→Visible genital outlines through clothing  
→Simplistic anuses (e.g. just an X or an outline for an anus)  
→Penis sheaths (i.e. skin for the penis to slide out of such as on a dog or horse)  
→Sexual rubbing or licking on sensitive areas, but not on the genitals or anus  
→Sloppy makeouts  
→Presence of (but not use of) sex toys  
→Objects used to represent genitals  
→Major overt fetish scenarios (e.g. inflation, diaper)
 
oh here is a copy of the Explicit description
 
Detailed description:  
The explicit tag is for sexually explicit images. This includes:  
→ Nudity showing the genitals or a detailed anus  
→ Sexual contact with genitals or anuses (even if not directly visible)  
→ Non-urine genital fluids
 
since they arent nude or in sexual contact or and there are no cum in the picture it doesnt count as explicit.

I need to see the outcome of this asap.

@Background Pony #1377  
You’d think that their pants would already be off by then.

The moment those two pop boners, those pants are history.

Pants tight, knees weak, arms spaghetti.

@Background Pony #42BB
 
bulllllshit

Wow! This makes me want more Equestria Hyper/Futa Girls.

@Background Pony #42BB  

@zebxen  
I disagree. If you remove the suggestive dialogue, this image is essentially SFW.

@Blissey1  
That’s all good. As long as they fill her to the brim.

@Background Pony #0E89  
Their pants are tight enough that you can tell that they have horse cocks instead of human cocks. I’m pretty sure it counts as explicit.

Considering this is not a simple bulge, and its quite detailed to boot, i say this should be explicit. Dunno if other mods will agree with me.

How long ago was this uploaded? Because a thread in the comments is already in the works.

@Background Pony #AD4F  
Nah, this is far past suggestive.

@edvd  
By putting one foot in front of the other.  
^{||If you now have a Rankin/Bass song stuck in your head, sorry not sorry.||}

@Background Pony #0E89  

 
or maybe suggestive i think

The best pillows in the world

@edvd  
Very slowly.