Conservatives generally have no pop culture media game. As a disposition, conservatism is build around submission to and respect for established authority (especially religious and familial authority), and they tend to despise modern entertainment. The best they can do is try and co-opt point-and-laugh chan culture, which, in the information age, may have become the new right-wing.
>”Thanks to the internet, I know now how terrific other countries are. I won’t move though. That would necessitate a personal effort. Also the 50% taxes might shatter my newly indoctrinated world view. I’ll live off the anonymous internet anecdotes and vote for Bernie Sanders”
Belgian officials said that its small country couldn’t risk offending China, so they decided not to hasten the visa application for one case of uighur asylum seekers (which, at the end of the story, were taken from the belgian embassy by chinese police.)Smart move by the Belgians. I don’t like it, but China is at the point where it can bully most errbody into submission. Better not phak around with da republic of people.Unrelated but Uighur women are highly advised to marry Han men. I’m glad they’re promoting interracial marriages!
There’s the risk, but by definition the free market is supposed to keep constant competency. Plus the monopoly would cause stagnation since there’s litte room for improvement and no need to make variety, which would eventually make the company crash eventually. At the prospect of a monopoly I would concede the state the right to interven, but until that happens I think the world needs free market for competency. If you don’t see competency, then make it yourself, the idea is avoid making people grown complacient.
@AaronMk
Plus, while rich people get a lot of pay, they’re also often the ones that usually gained their job from the ground like everybody else or were the fouders that had to make a lot of invertion to make it work in a high risk high reward situation. If you don’t compete, then you can’t get the huge pays for yourself.
Plus, while rich people get a lot of pay, they’re also often the ones that usually gained their job from the ground
Plus, while rich people get a lot of pay, they’re also often the ones that usually gained their job from the ground like everybody else or were the fouders that had to make a lot of invertion to make it work in a high risk high reward situation. If you don’t compete, then you can’t get the huge pays for yourself.
Plus, while rich people get a lot of pay, they’re also often the ones that usually gained their job from the ground like everybody else or were the fouders that had to make a lot of invertion to make it work in a high risk high reward situation. If you don’t compete, then you can’t get the huge pays for yourself.I feel comfortably certain that, while standouts certainly exist, the majority of rich people today inherited their riches. And that the majority of those inherited riches didn’t come from hard work or invention, but from sheer luck (at best), or most likely ties to nobility, royalty, clergy, politics, or pure crime/evil deeds.If you’re born with money, making more money is really really easy.
Well then what do you think it would be a better system? Socialism didn’t work.
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!