@Kazapsky
“executive privilege” on what grounds though? I can’t think of any. It’s one thing to classify information during an ongoing investigation, but once it’s concluded, what’s your excuse? There is none.
This power can be used in two circumstances: “(1) certain national security needs and (2) protecting the privacy of White House deliberations when it is in the public interest to do so.” The second part is especially valuable, as it allows presidential advisers to freely speak their minds without the threat of a subpoena.
Under which circumstances does this apply, and how?
If it doesn’t, then he can’t claim ‘executive privilege’ as a means of hiding the result of the Special Council Investigation.
Meuller’s final report will be public.