neutralgrey
@angrybrony
He also tries to throw people off by talking about something completely different
He also tries to throw people off by talking about something completely different
He still did it in the most vapid way possible.
@angrybrony
He without sin.
He without sin.
Like, read a book.
I’m reading a book about cod and its roll in history.
What is the name of the book? It sounds like it might describe the economic history of cod.
@AaronMk
Let’s not speculate as to whether the case is that Hegel is correct, or the case is that Hegel is not correct. That will just lead to more drinking.
@Hypnosryan
Well, was he right?Was there data provided?
@AaronMk
True, but for the staff it’s more … or less … philosophical. People are telling us we should ban person ‘X’ because their thesis or argument is “wrong”, or less “right” than the person reporting them.But the metric for banning is whether rules are being broken - how people are behaving, not where someone falls on a political scale or what their beliefs are.So, a lot of the people who come to us with an argument about the “rightness” of a ban based on the morality of someone else’s beliefs are already “wrong”.In that context, a “right” conversation is, at least, not confrontational or antagonistic, even if it’s raving lunacy. And a “wrong” conversation is one where someone is being an ass to others, even if their argument has value and is well made.
@PonyPon
it’s just “scientific” racism. using “science” to prove you’re totally not a racist, it’s the thing hitler used to justify his atrocities.
@Hypnosryan
Technically he’s right, but it has less to do with race and more to do with the fact that Europe has better and more schools than Africa.Why did he say that anyway?
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!