Stupid stuff that comes to mind that we want to post

@Lord Arceus  
He’s just making an observation.

@Meanlucario  

 
No, just expensive.

@ExtreVile  
Than why call the new Lion King movie “live action” if it’s purely CGI? And it’s Disney, they will make a profit unless they exceed the USA military budget.

@Meanlucario  
Maybe it’s the realistic nature of the CGI, because technology is advancing so quickly these days.

@Meanlucario  

 

 
Also what’s this “we” shit?

@ExtreVile  
But it’s still not live action. It’s realistic animation, not live action. What’s wrong will saying that it’s animated and not live action? Why lie about that?

@Darth Prime  
Royal “we.”

@Meanlucario  
Cause they don’t want to tell the truth.

@Darth Prime  
On an unrelated note,
 
 
We are Venom.

@ExtreVile  
What’s so bad about it being animated with CGI and not live action? Is animation a dirty word now?

@Meanlucario  
Are you turning into Hollowfox?

@Meanlucario  
That’s the same question I would ask to people who are bemoaning that future SpongeBob and MLP movies will be CGI instead of 2D.

@Meanlucario  

 
I don’t know if it’s Disney per se.  
But I watched a review of Aladdin and the guy was talking about why these movies are being made and obviously there’s the nostalgia factor and taking their kids to see them but the question then is “why not just watch the original?” and the reviewer come up with the reason that people want to enjoy these movies without the “stigma” of enjoying a cartoon because that’s something to be ashamed apparently.
 
Now if could have found it this is where a gif of Batman saying “sounds wacky to me too” would be.

@Darth Prime  
To be fair, the stigma against animation needs to die.

@Meanlucario  
Maybe they don’t want to use actual animals.

@LightningBolt  
I’m just questioning why they’re calling it live action when it isn’t.
 
@Hollowfox Jaeger  
If that is happening, blame Disney for trying to get away from 2D and animation as much as possible these days.

@Darth Prime  
@Hollowfox Jaeger  

 
 
@ExtreVile  
So why call it live action when it isn’t? That’s my question you haven’t answered.

@Meanlucario  
I think it’s more about how film adaptations of TV cartoons affected 2D animation for Disney.
 
Besides, Disney still makes animated films with their Disney Animation and Pixar. Sure, it’s CGI but still.

@Hollowfox Jaeger  
What is the majority of their movies these last few years are, though? Disney goes through peaks and valleys.
 
And it was Disney that made animation so popular to begin with, so they have the power to remind people that 2D animation isn’t childish. Sadly, it’s those with the power to take a chance that are unwilling to take the risk.

when you turn the ketchup bottle upside down, it becomes ketchdown.

 
Does not surprise me in the slightest.

@The Equestrian Zodiac  
Boy or girl?

@LightningBolt  
It’s the internet, so girl.

@Meanlucario  
Damn.