XJ-9 should imply Jenny Wakeman

“XJ-9” -> “Jenny Wakeman”
 
“xj9” already implies Jenny Wakeman, now the same should be true for XJ-9.

xj-9 -> jenny wakeman  
Should probably give proper format too, to make it easier.

@Dogman15  
xj9 is already aliased to Jenny Wakeman, so why not alias this one too?

@Solitude  
This

@Dragonpone  
I did format it correctly, after an edit.
 
@Solitude  
That’s exactly what I said; I don’t see how what you said is any different.

@Dogman15  
You said implication, but what you’re actually asking for is an alias.
 
XJ9 is an alias of Jenny Wakeman, so XJ-9 should also be an alias of it.

@cheezedoodle  
this
 
@Dogman15  
Ah, see, an alias is when two tags get merged together while an implication will add a separate tag along with the original tag when tagged.

@cheezedoodle  
@Solitude  
Crap, I’m sorry. I was typing one thing but thinking another. I know the difference, I just didn’t notice my mix-up.

It’s done.