Tags referencing the comment section should be disallowed.

This is an image hosting website, and tags should reflect the content of images. There is no productive reason anyone needs to browse an image site by the content of the comments under an image. I imagine people who like to troll will disagree but as I said, no productive reason.
 
More often than not tags referencing the comment section are negative or insults likely left by trolls and greifers anyway. There is no reason to navigate a website meant for the storing and viewing of images via a tag that does not reference the images.

I dunno, sometimes they can be relevant, and can help you find a particular image, or comment section. So honestly, I find it kinda annoying you keep removing tags (especially almost every single “User Meltdown in the Comments” image) from certain images like that, which is making it harder for people like me to to look for particular images, or entertaining images/comment sections.
 
Also, this isn’t just an image archive site, but a user interactivity site, (otherwise we wouldn’t have a forum) so comment interactivity is part of the image, and without them, artists can’t answer questions, or give more information on images, or feedback. Comment sections can be entertaining or informative to read too, so I disagree, and I think the commentary can be important for an image tag too.
 
So please stop erasing tags, and such, it’s getting annoying, no offense.

I don’t think whether or not a user ‘had a meltdown’ is pertanate information except to thoes who want to laugh at someone’s misery.
 
As for ‘Sock puppeting’ tag, that cannot be proven, except by staff. Therefor it should not be a tag. It cannot be objectively true.
 
Thats another thing. Tags that are opinions and not facts should be disallowed.

@Charade  
Well, who are you to decide what stays, and what goes? People keep readding that tag, and you keep removing it, and it was an admin that put in originally, and invented it for that one pic,  
While I suppose it’s kinda mean to laugh at others’ freak-out posts, but they probably shouldn’t be freaking out in the first place, and if they’re misbehaving, or cussing out admins, or other users, maybe they deserve some slight satire, or to be called out on their unusual behavior, and encourage others not to act the same.
 
I do agree about the “sock-puppetting” tag, as that should be up to admins to decide, as they are the only ones whom can prove that.
 

 
Then alot of tags wouldn’t be allowed, as you can’t always prove or “back-up” them either. Like I’ve seen alot of pics of two characters just looking friendly, or hugging, that are tagged with “shipping,” (hugging, or just standing next to each other isn’t always a “romantic” gesture) and only the artist knows for sure if a pic is ‘shipping, but sometimes they disappear from the fanbase, or site, so we can’t get their confirmation all the time, so some other uploaders, or users just have to make a wild guess if it is, or isn’t.

@Beau Skunky  
Only a troll or griefer would want to laugh at people’s pain like that and their input shouldn’t matter. I don’t mean like ‘tags that might be true’ I mean like objectively opinion tags. As a matter of fact whether something qualifies as a ‘meltdown’ is an opinion. And tags like ‘op is right’ or ‘op is wrong’ when the pic itself is a meme format of an opinion. They are not helpful tags to find the images you want to view and only serve as griefing and trolling tools.

@Charade  
Not necessarily. You ever laugh at a Youtube video or movie of somebody getting kicked in the groin, or something?  
You ever laugh, because a crooked bad guy or politician or something gets exposed/busted? Sometimes it’s justified.  
It doesn’t make you a troll who wants to laugh at everybody’s misery, just because you can chuckle at some people’s odd, or bad behavior online, and it’s just annoying you wanna remove a tag from all pictures within it, just because of you personally don’t like it.
 
Well, I’d say that pic where that guy goes nuts and cusses out the admins, or the guy flipping out thinking the admins are stalking him at least qualify for “meltdowns.” Not just any freak-out, but it’d have to be pretty big like those.  
You can’t really justify bad behavior like that, and sometimes it’s ok to chuckle at things like that, as long as you don’t troll, or attack the person, adding fuel to the fire.
 
(And I see you removed those tags again from those two images… Boy, you’re obsessed with that. How many times do you check on those exact same pics just to remove those tags?)

@Beau Skunky  
I’m not one of those blood-lusted monsters who justifies the bullying of others with ‘Hur dur they did 1 bad thing!!’ The hate fuled freaks that sit there are try to tout that 1 bad thing undoes hundreds of good and thousands of neutral actions are a disease we would be better off without. Just mindless, hate-worshiping beasts desperately clawing for a reason to attack others.

@Charade  
Just because somebody finds something somebody says online humorous, doesn’t make them some kinda “monster,” or a bully.  
And honestly, it’s not like that guy cussing everybody out, and threatening people was a “saint” himself, people were even trying to calm him down, or reason with him, and he kept flipping out. So you’re kinda white-knighting for the wrong kinda person.
 
So I suppose you’ve never laughed at a movie, Youtube video, or AFV, or something?
 
Also, you’re not supposed to remove tags put up by an admin, so whenever you remove that tag, (which was basically just a joke with no harm meant) technically you’re breaking the rules. So cut it out. If you don’t like a tag, you can use your filter to block it, rather then try to delete everything under it. (And apparently there’s one pic >>1792526 you’re apparently unable to edit that tag off, as editing it’s tags was disabled. so you’ll never get rid of that tag anyway, no matter how many times you delete it off those other two pics.)
 
And looking through your tag removal history, you’ve even deleted “sock-puppeting in the comments” off images where it was proven/stated by admins that somebody was doing that. So in that case that’s not an “opinion.”  
(And I can’t believe you’re so dedicated to getting rid of every tag you dislike. No offense, but you’re the only one offended by that tag.)

@Beau Skunky  
What purpose could anyone POSSIBLY have to search for images based on sock-pupping in the comments? Also I looked at the history of the one image and I did not see the little staff flair next to the first instance of the tag being added.
 
But if we refuse to get rid of these griefing tools that don’t descibe the content of the image and therefore don’t serve the purpose a tag is meant to serve then perhaps a comprimise?
 
I propose a new tag that would be implied by ‘user meltdown’, ‘op is right/wrong/duck’ ‘comments more entertaining’ ‘bad drawing’ ect.
 
an ‘Opinions in tags’ tag. Similar to the ‘wall of tags’ tag describing the other tags.

@Charade  
I assume some are curious if anyone does that here, which of course you can’t get away with, because admins can tell whom is sock-puppeting. What purpose is there going on every pic under a certain tag, (or tags) and removing it from all of them?
 
On the original user meltdown pic LoneLampMan added the tag. He was an admin at the time. (I guess he’s not anymore, so I dunno if that’s against rules, or not.) He was the one whom made the “user meltdown in the comments” tag originally. Very rarely a pic usually gets that tag, so I don’t think it was overused, or anything, so I don’t get why you’re so obsessed removing it, and other tags. It’s made it a li’l harder for me to find certain pics, or comment sections.
 
If somebody is having, an epic meltdown/tantrum, and cussing everybody out, that’s not merely an opinion of “Is it a user meltdown?” when it obviously is one. You seem to be the only one upset over that tag, no offense.  
I guess “opinion in tags” could work for certain pics though.
 
I guess “Bad drawing” is an unfair tag though, as some might spam that on any image they personally dislike.