Spur Implications

older spur -> spur + older  
busty spur -> spur + breasts if needed  
cozy spur -> spur + cozy glow  
spurcuit -> spur + biscuit + shipping + straight (possibly also incest)  
There’s also spur is not amused but I don’t know if anything needs to be implied here…

I’m not sure how totally necessary some are, but done.  
I’ve left incest off the ship tag for now, I’ll try to check around later to see if there’s a consensus to how the relation between the two is treated on this site.

In regards to assuming close relations, this comes up with things like Berry Punch and Ruby Shine all the time; you’re welcome to make art where it’s incest, but canon never said a word on the matter so the default assumption has to be that it’s not (because otherwise we’d be declaring some cute ship of friends incest and that does not go well).

@Princess Luna  
Isn’t that what people assume for Flitter and Cloudchaser too even tho it’s never said?

@LightningBolt  
Dang, I’d written a whole response saying this before I saw you responded :p
 
Also a sorta response from Jim
 
That said, I think keeping it off is best.

@Dragonpone  
Yeah if it’s not stated it’s best left off unless the art itself states it.
 
I think we do this for the dazzlings, comic call them sisters, EQG doesn’t, and most artists don’t, so it’s not tagged unless the artist states them to be related.

@Dragonpone  
It was only his personal theory on their relationship to each other.

@The Equestrian Zodiac  
That’s why I said “sorta”. I still think it shouldn’t be an implication.

@Dragonpone  
I feel the same way about that myself, it really shouldn’t be implicated.

spurbetes -> spur
 
Found another one. To be fair, it’s very recent.

@Wiimeiser  
This tag implies the tag cute

@Wiimeiser  
@Melisareb  
Done.

Another one, this time one I made myself: pispurchio -> Spur + Pistachio + Straight + Shipping

@Wiimeiser  
Done.