Background Pony #C243
This is something that’s been discussed off and on in the past, including with a very similar thread.
Overall, it seems like everyone agrees but nobody decided conclusively to make it so, possibly to avoid “big breasts” getting added inappropriately because it also seems like everyone agrees that users will continue to apply the “busty X” tags with loose abandon.
As it stands, I interpret “busty X” tags to not apply for flat/small breasts, and to be more than just “unremarkable/no size tag”/“medium”/“reasonable” size but not necessarily all the way to “big”.
@Roseluck
Overall, it seems like everyone agrees but nobody decided conclusively to make it so, possibly to avoid “big breasts” getting added inappropriately because it also seems like everyone agrees that users will continue to apply the “busty X” tags with loose abandon.
As it stands, I interpret “busty X” tags to not apply for flat/small breasts, and to be more than just “unremarkable/no size tag”/“medium”/“reasonable” size but not necessarily all the way to “big”.
@Roseluck
- I assume people who browse busty tags in the first place do so because they want to see, precisely, big breasts
As it is, they can use it to find specific characters that aren’t flat/small-chested.
- If someone wants to filter these out, they need to include
big breasts
in their filters… along with every single busty character tag they’re aware of because none of them imply it.
In other words, you’re saying you see people neglecting to tag “big breasts” when it should apply, and tagging only with a “busty X”? Yeah, I guess so, but I feel like more often it’s the opposite - I’ve needed to add the “busty X” tag to “big breasts”-tagged images a lot.