The ratings guidelines have been updated. In terms of actual enforcement changes, there’s one big thing and a few minor things to expect:
Fetish content dealt with in a more gradated manner (mainly this means stuff like tamer but clearly fetishized things will be Suggestive, as opposed to previously jumping certain things to Questionable while others stayed at Safe).
“Suggestive eating” and the like should only be Suggestive, not Questionable.
Things like anal beads (sex toys that aren’t very visually striking) should only be Suggestive, not Questionable.
Insertions that aren’t sexual in nature won’t trigger Questionable.
So, I mostly upload inflation fetish and fat fetish content, and I’m not completely clear on how the updated guidelines would apply. Let me see if I have this straight:
Inflation or fat pictures that aren’t too far removed from what’s already appeared in the show (character isn’t too huge, it’s presented as a joke rather than sensually) would be safe.
Inflation or fat pictures that are presented sensually, but where the character isn’t “disproportionately large”, would be suggestive.
Pictures of disproportionately fat or inflated characters would be questionable automatically.
@Rainboom Dash
It’s uploader’s tagging so there’s no reason to expect it’s “seriously” explicit. To address your actual query, “sexual acts that aren’t actually sex” is a verbatim quote from the Questionable tag description so that seems perfectly appropriate.
Male toplessness baffles me of late. The search topless male, solo, suggestive, (solo OR solo focus) gives a whole bunch of results that in my very own personal opinion show nothing racier than what one might expect to see on a beach or on a streetside advert any day of the week, rendered in levels of detail, style and focus that don’t seem fetishy at all.
(Not a comprehensive list of cases whose rating situation is less than solid, just trying to list some typical examples.)
@saby
Generally male chests shouldn’t even be considered for ratings unless the mammaries suddenly become rounded like a female’s.
As for the last two images, both should be Questionable I think, there’s no reason that an erection would bump it up to Explicit.
Rating? >>2477457t (merged)
The uploader had it as suggestive at first, but that’s pretty clearly Fluttershy’s anus poking out from around her bikini bottom so I upped the rating to explicit for now just in case. Does that seem accurate?
@Princess Luna
True, just wanted to point those out for general educational purposes. Wasn’t certain whether the amount of anus-adjacent anatomy was going to warrant Explicit.
@Binkyt11
I believe the idea is that the tentacles are somewhat genital-like in nature and thus the liquid dripping from them is rather sexual, but it’s not really something from the image’s context alone, so should just be Safe.
So I’m seeing a mixture of diaper grinding images are questionable and explicit.. and I don’t see why some are questionable and some are explicit
just seems like people are tagging randomly.. like this is explicit >>2480198 but then these are questionable >>1612564>>1614651