Pony with care! Remember to tag images from or revealing story of the G5 movie with spoiler:my little pony: a new generation, and report any images of camrips/leaks for Rule 1!

Rating tags general

Princess Luna
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Thread Starter - Started a thread with over 100 pages
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Notoriously Divine Tagger - Consistently uploads images above and beyond the minimum tag requirements. And/or additionally, bringing over the original description from the source if the image has one. Does NOT apply to the uploader adding several to a dozen tags after originally uploading with minimum to bare tagging.
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Economist -
A Perfectly Normal Pony - <%Nebulon> Yeah, just fetch me a smaller anus, sweetie.
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - #1 Assistant
From the Night -

Administrator
Site Developer
Tag Czar
The ratings guidelines have been updated. In terms of actual enforcement changes, there's one big thing and a few minor things to expect:
- Fetish content dealt with in a more gradated manner (mainly this means stuff like tamer but clearly fetishized things will be Suggestive, as opposed to previously jumping certain things to Questionable while others stayed at Safe).
- "Suggestive eating" and the like should only be Suggestive, not Questionable.
- Things like anal beads (sex toys that aren't very visually striking) should only be Suggestive, not Questionable.
- Insertions that aren't sexual in nature won't trigger Questionable.
radpanic
Not a Llama - Happy April Fools Day!

never big enough
@Princess Luna

So, I mostly upload inflation fetish and fat fetish content, and I'm not completely clear on how the updated guidelines would apply. Let me see if I have this straight:

- Inflation or fat pictures that aren't too far removed from what's already appeared in the show (character isn't too huge, it's presented as a joke rather than sensually) would be safe.

- Inflation or fat pictures that are presented sensually, but where the character isn't "disproportionately large", would be suggestive.

- Pictures of disproportionately fat or inflated characters would be questionable automatically.

Is that right?
saby
Verified Pegasus - Show us your gorgeous wings!
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Twinkling Balloon - Took part in the 2021 community collab.
Philomena - For helping others attend the 2021 community collab
Ten years of changes - Celebrated the 10th anniversary of MLP:FiM!
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Best Art Program Ever - For artists who were courageous enough to draw something for the April Fools day.
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
The Magic of Friendship Grows - For helping others attend the 2020 Community Collab
Friendship, Art, and Magic (2020) - Took part in the 2020 Community Collab

fun at parties
@Rainboom Dash
It's uploader's tagging so there's no reason to expect it's "seriously" explicit. To address your actual query, "sexual acts that aren't actually sex" is a verbatim quote from the Questionable tag description so that seems perfectly appropriate.
saby
Verified Pegasus - Show us your gorgeous wings!
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Twinkling Balloon - Took part in the 2021 community collab.
Philomena - For helping others attend the 2021 community collab
Ten years of changes - Celebrated the 10th anniversary of MLP:FiM!
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Best Art Program Ever - For artists who were courageous enough to draw something for the April Fools day.
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
The Magic of Friendship Grows - For helping others attend the 2020 Community Collab
Friendship, Art, and Magic (2020) - Took part in the 2020 Community Collab

fun at parties
Male toplessness baffles me of late. The search topless male, solo, suggestive, (solo OR solo focus) gives a whole bunch of results that in my very own personal opinion show nothing racier than what one might expect to see on a beach or on a streetside advert any day of the week, rendered in levels of detail, style and focus that don't seem fetishy at all.

(Not a comprehensive list of cases whose rating situation is less than solid, just trying to list some typical examples.)


Flirty but safe?


Fully clothed bottom, safe?


Totally covered bottom, safe?


A bit exaggerated but not too fetishy for safe? Looks about the same amount of detail we'd see on a generic superhero on the cover.


Typical clothing situation of a rock artist. Safe?


Just a wee bit farther than Angela Merkel. Obviously not proper for a dinner with state heads, but still safe?


Questionable due to obvious but non detailed genital outline? (More detailed than we'd see on an underwear ad, at least.)


Explicit due to covered but obvious and erect third leg?
Princess Luna
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Thread Starter - Started a thread with over 100 pages
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Notoriously Divine Tagger - Consistently uploads images above and beyond the minimum tag requirements. And/or additionally, bringing over the original description from the source if the image has one. Does NOT apply to the uploader adding several to a dozen tags after originally uploading with minimum to bare tagging.
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Economist -
A Perfectly Normal Pony - <%Nebulon> Yeah, just fetch me a smaller anus, sweetie.
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - #1 Assistant
From the Night -

Administrator
Site Developer
Tag Czar
@saby
Generally male chests shouldn't even be considered for ratings unless the mammaries suddenly become rounded like a female's.
As for the last two images, both should be Questionable I think, there's no reason that an erection would bump it up to Explicit.
Background Pony #F383
Rating?
>>2477457t (merged)
The uploader had it as suggestive at first, but that's pretty clearly Fluttershy's anus poking out from around her bikini bottom so I upped the rating to explicit for now just in case. Does that seem accurate?
saby
Verified Pegasus - Show us your gorgeous wings!
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Twinkling Balloon - Took part in the 2021 community collab.
Philomena - For helping others attend the 2021 community collab
Ten years of changes - Celebrated the 10th anniversary of MLP:FiM!
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Best Art Program Ever - For artists who were courageous enough to draw something for the April Fools day.
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
The Magic of Friendship Grows - For helping others attend the 2020 Community Collab
Friendship, Art, and Magic (2020) - Took part in the 2020 Community Collab

fun at parties
@Princess Luna
True, just wanted to point those out for general educational purposes. Wasn't certain whether the amount of anus-adjacent anatomy was going to warrant Explicit.
Princess Luna
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Thread Starter - Started a thread with over 100 pages
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Notoriously Divine Tagger - Consistently uploads images above and beyond the minimum tag requirements. And/or additionally, bringing over the original description from the source if the image has one. Does NOT apply to the uploader adding several to a dozen tags after originally uploading with minimum to bare tagging.
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Economist -
A Perfectly Normal Pony - <%Nebulon> Yeah, just fetch me a smaller anus, sweetie.
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - #1 Assistant
From the Night -

Administrator
Site Developer
Tag Czar
@Binkyt11
I believe the idea is that the tentacles are somewhat genital-like in nature and thus the liquid dripping from them is rather sexual, but it's not really something from the image's context alone, so should just be Safe.
Rainboom Dash
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Ten years of changes - Celebrated the 10th anniversary of MLP:FiM!
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - #1 Assistant
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Wallet After Summer Sale -
Artist -
A Tale For The Ages - Celebrated MLP's 35th Anniversary and FiM's 8th Anniversary
Birthday Cake - Celebrated MLP's 7th birthday
Not a Llama - Happy April Fools Day!

Rainbooms4Ever
So I'm seeing a mixture of diaper grinding images are questionable and explicit.. and I don't see why some are questionable and some are explicit
just seems like people are tagging randomly.. like this is explicit >>2480198 but then these are questionable >>1612564 >>1614651
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Ministry of Image - Fanfiction Printing

Derpibooru costs over $25 a day to operate - help support us financially!

Syntax quick reference: *bold* _italic_ [spoiler]hide text[/spoiler] @code@ +underline+ -strike- ^sup^ ~sub~