Male toplessness baffles me of late. The search topless male, solo, suggestive, (solo OR solo focus)
gives a whole bunch of results that in my very own personal opinion show nothing racier than what one might expect to see on a beach or on a streetside advert any day of the week, rendered in levels of detail, style and focus that don't seem fetishy at all.
(Not a comprehensive list of cases whose rating situation is less than solid, just trying to list some typical examples.)
Flirty but safe?
Fully clothed bottom, safe?
Totally covered bottom, safe?
A bit exaggerated but not too fetishy for safe? Looks about the same amount of detail we'd see on a generic superhero on the cover.
Typical clothing situation of a rock artist. Safe?
Just a wee bit farther than Angela Merkel. Obviously not proper for a dinner with state heads, but still safe?
Questionable due to obvious but non detailed genital outline? (More detailed than we'd see on an underwear ad, at least.)
Explicit due to covered but obvious and erect third leg?