"Pony bigger than" implication chain
Litrojia 
This isn’t a definite no, but I’m not keen on this idea for a few reasons:
- For the largest ponies in the chain, having all the lower tags on the images gets unwieldy.
- While the tags have “pony” in the name, they seem to be used as catch-all tags for very large creatures. Though I could set the “pony bigger than…” tags to imply “giant pony” and not “pony”, “giant pony” is clearly made for ponies. As an aside, there are some non-ponies (mostly anthro, which don’t get tagged as ponies) under the tag, so that tag needs to be cleaned up.
- Some images under the tags are hyper (upscaled body parts) but not macro (entire body upscaled).
saby 
Moderator
extra fun at parties
@Litrojia
re #1: it’s consistent with how our multiple breast sizes are tagged tho. Hyper breasts means the picture also has impossible, huge, and large.
I’d rather merge [>universe, >galaxy, >solar system], as well as [>star, >planet]. Having all these tags doesn’t seem useful, more like just a pissing match for macro artists.
re #1: it’s consistent with how our multiple breast sizes are tagged tho. Hyper breasts means the picture also has impossible, huge, and large.
I’d rather merge [>universe, >galaxy, >solar system], as well as [>star, >planet]. Having all these tags doesn’t seem useful, more like just a pissing match for macro artists.
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!