[NSFW] piercing tags alias or imply

This was originally going to be for one tag (labret), but now it’s for every piercing tag I could think of/find I guess.

Alias
labret piercing -> labret
areola piercing -> nipple piercing
stomach piercing, belly piercing -> bellyring
taint piercing -> guiche piercing (A guiche piercing is a body piercing through the perineum.)
frenum piercing, medial ring piercing, pierced flare, pierced cock -> penile piercing
mouth piercing, mouth piercings, pierced lip -> lip piercing
anal piercings -> anal piercing
septum piercing, nasal piercing -> nose piercing
nipple piercing through clothes -> nipple piercing outline
vagina piercing, vulva piercing -> vaginal piercing
pierced ears, pierced ear -> ear piercing
pierced eyebrow -> eyebrow piercing
pierced genitals -> genital piercing
snakebites -> snake bites

=========================
Imply
labia piercing -> vaginal piercing
corset piercing -> piercing
guiche piercing -> piercing
guiche piercing -> genital piercing
nipple piercing outline -> piercing
snake bites -> lip piercing

=========================
Alias OR Imply
labret -> lip piercing (Also labret -> piercing if imply)
tail piercing -> dock piercing (imply in reverse. needs cleanup if untouched)
clitoral hood piercing -> vaginal piercing (likely undertagged)

https://www.spencersonline.com/blog/types-of-lip-piercings-everything-you-need-to-know/ (relevant to a couple of tags)

To whichever mod completes this, you can also close my thread for it.

That one is already set up with implications (including penile piercing). Why do you suggest it get aliased?

I’d like to add:
industrial piercing -> ear piercing (it already implies piercing)

I don’t understand why you’d write it that way? Don’t you just mean dock piercing imply-> tail piercing? (OFC there are non-dock tail piercings)

@Background Pony #45AB
frenum piercing has the implications, but for search and tagging purposes, it seems like a useless distinction.

industrial piercing wasn’t sure if I should add that to the list because I thought it was just “large barbell/rod” piercings. If I’m wrong, that seems like a good implication.

tail piercing because there’s so few non-dock tail piercings, it goes back to the first reason. People might very well be searching for the wrong thing without knowing for dock piercings, but type in tail because they’re not aware of the anatomy. If it’s not aliased (the primary suggestion), then the implication has to go in the other direction I listed. If neither happen, then it needs cleanup.

@Brokedownandmadeone
I’m hardly a piercing expert. My quick-Google understanding is that an “industrial piercing” is a solid (ie. non-chain) connection between two piercings, as-good-as exclusively if not truly exclusively performed on ears. I’m only really aware of them due to enthusiasm for them from an artist or two I used to follow.

@Brokedownandmadeone
@Background Pony #45AB
Most done, but there are a few I thought worth bringing up:

I see there are already some belly piercing synonyms aliasing into bellyring, but I could see use in keeping them separate (probably with belly piercing as the main tag), simply having one imply another like earring to ear piercing.

I also wouldn’t mind having more specific piercings if they’ve got proper names, I’ve kept labret, dock piercing, clitoral hood piercing, frenum piercing and septum piercing as implications.
Perhaps nose piercing could also be tagged with septum piercing or nostril piercing depending on kind.
^{yes, I realize keeping all these would mean a lot of tag cleaning for me}

Do these sound like acceptable implications, or would total aliases be preferred?

@Dragonpone
Functionally speaking, reason I opted for the bellyring alias was because of the already wide use and lack of separation early on. It would be an okay idea to do the separate suggestion, but then it’ll need quite a bit of cleanup. However, it’s hard to justify at this point due to the previous aliases on the primary tag.

Those’re alright. But for frenum and septum piercings, they’re plain under-tagged because of lack of knowledge, and/or just simplicity. I’d personally think it’d make more sense to just alias those two and be done with it. Maybe even adding the nostril piercing tag and aliasing that too for searching purposes. Otherwise, those nose piercing tags will need some vast cleaning up too.

Replying here because it seems like as good a thread to discuss piercing tags in as to start a new one.

stomach piercing alias-> belly piercing
It had been suggested for belly piercing to be aliased to bellyring, but because bellyring implies belly piercing it seems to have been decided that it means something distinct.

facial piercing imply-> piercing
teat piercing imply-> piercing
male nipple piercing (sorry LightningBolt it has almost 150 posts) imply-> piercing
neck piercing imply-> piercing
sheath piercing imply-> genital piercing, piercing, should it also imply penile piercing?

facial piercing isn’t implied by anything, currently. Should other piercings of anatomy that are on the face, like nose piercing, eyebrow piercing, or lip piercing count as (and imply) “facial piercing”? I don’t think they should. My impression is they are culturally considered in a different category of “alt-ness”.

Should bridge piercing (as in the nose bridge) count as a “nose piercing”? I don’t think it should.
I think bridge piercing and cheek piercing should imply-> facial piercing

@Background Pony #45AB
All the above seems good to me.

@Background Pony #45AB
Having 150 usages doesn’t make it worthwhile. It can just be aliased into nipple piercing and should. Gendering things pointlessly is just dumb. We gonna start tagging male earring now?

Plus it’s like 99.99% all one guy’s usage. Too bad. Personal tags are not valid. Same guy who forced the male nipples tag that people argued against me to keep for some reason. Would love people to argue for its existence now and tell me if they had any validity to their arguments. But w/e, not the thread for it.

Everything else is fine.

@LightningBolt
Ah, I didn’t notice it was all one person’s usage. I just noticed it was tagged more than posts tagged “nipple piercing” that are guaranteed to be males.

@Background Pony #45AB
Doesn’t surprise me. I’ve brought up one-person useless tag annoyances before doing the same thing.
I’m getting off-topic.