[nsfw] grinding implication

hotdogging -> grinding

Grinding is front to front. Hotdogging involves the butt cheeks so front to back.
 
I don’t think that hotdogging should imply grinding.

@Ciaran  
Is it? A fair amount of hotdogging includes the tag.
 
Grinding itself is a bit of a vague tag, honestly. It seems like it should just involve the grinding of one bodypart against another for the purposes of sexual gratification. Though by that definition it should probably be implicated by things like boobjob and frottage as well.

Grinding is the general case, but hotdogging is a specific sexual act which I’m not sure is technically “grinding”, except that the hips may be moving in a similar manner.
 
Maybe we should define the tags better.

@Ciaran  
That’s probably a good idea, yes.

I need to sleep right now but I’ll help with this tomorrow - Please PM me if I forget.
 
One thing that would help is an image that quintessentially illustrates each of the terms.

@Ciaran  
Can do.
 
>>1284426 or >>1267502 is a good example for female grinding, I think. The majority of the examples involving males (>>1063973, >>1291039, >>1208727) mostly just show how close it is to hotdogging. It just usually uses the other hole, instead.
 
>>1283385, >>1254777, and >>1229320 are all good examples of proper hotdogging in action.
 
Hopefully this is good enough for your purposes.

Oh, right - this thing. This thing that we’re doing.
 
I didn’t add images because I’m not sure about the filtering stuff - let’s come back to that after the text descriptions are done.
 
I updated grinding, hotdogging, and tribadism, since they are all three different variants of similar hip-and-genitals games.
 
Please let me know if you see anything that should be improved or changed.

@Ciaran  
I suppose the general definitions are alright. For grinding I’d remove the “Usually this is done with clothes on” part of the description, seeing as most images feature either totally or partially nude characters.

@Napsack  
That’s the tricky bit with ponies, isn’t it? :)
 

 
Modified.
 
Let me know if there’s any additional changes that you think should be made - I didn’t include the images yet because I want to see how other explicit tags handle it. If you have an example of an explicit tag with a sample image, please let me know and I’ll do it like that one. :)

@Ciaran  
As far as the definitions are concerned, I think everything is fine as-is. Any of the samples above should be good enough for an example image.

I think I’m going to go sans example image. Unless there’s confusion, I’m wary of putting explicit images on tag descriptions.