General Tag Discussion

@TexasUberAlles  
We don’t distinguish tagging by number for objects. In general, we alias to the singular form for most objects, but to plurals if something is meant to come in groups.
 
@Damaged  
I’ve taken a look at “mouthpiece” and adjusted its definition. It should apply whenever canon characters are just putting real-world slogans to the viewer, since it’s pretty unlikely any of them would agree with the exact goals of any movement.  
Do note however that if Twilight gave a generic speech on how racism is bad, that would not be mouthpiece.
 
Note further that it does not apply simply whenever a character is acting out of character, like AJ being homophobic. It’s for things being spat at the viewer by the character, as if they’re a megaphone.

Is the tag ask-the-pony-gamers is an artist tag or fanfic tag?

@Princess Luna  
Got it. Do you want me to go through my recent uploads and modify any that need to be changed, or did you get those? Either way, I’ll keep this definition in mind going forward.

Can we please merge crying inside and crying on the inside to whichever fits better (I prefer the latter, but the former has more uses)?
 
And have Applejack cries on the inside imply it (and Applejack of course)?

@Litrojia  
@Yoshimon1
 
Turns out someone already made a tag: ah yes me my girlfriend and her x.

Should there be a separate “Megan Williams (EQG)” and “Megan Williams (G1)” tag to distinguish the character designed as a homage to her in “Rollercoaster of Friendship” from the G1 character? (I remember there being a thread specifically for this kind of tagging discussion, but I can’t find it again)

@Jarkes  
In MLP Wiki the EqG one is refered as unnamed human, that resemble Megan Williams.

@Markiz93
 
Well, we’ve mostly just been using “Megan Williams” for both iterations.

@Jarkes  
Searching can already be accomplished with existing tags easily enough. megan williams, equestria girls or megan williams, -equestria girls will accomplish the same as making new tags.
 
While I think the G1 version of her is fleshed out well, the EqG Megan Williams doesn’t really have any personality to make her distinct from the G1 version (and won’t be getting any now the show is over).

Giant/tiny? Does this do anything that somehow isn’t covered by micro and macro? It looks to have been made by one person and I’m not sure what their aim was behind its creation and use.

@Background Pony #0299  
I think it’s meant to say that both are in the same image…which is definitely dumb. I’m just not sure whether to alias it to macro or micro or outright nuke it.

@Princess Luna  
Not to mention we also have “size difference”:tags/size+difference to cover anything “micro” or “macro” wouldn’t.

@Princess Luna  
I think it’s supposed to mean giant-on-tiny.

@Officer Hotpants  
In which case it should be renamed to conform to the other X on Y tags.
 
Or perhaps even better, renamed to “larger on smaller” for a broader scope, and its current scope would then be achieved by searching “larger on smaller” && (micro||macro).
 
I’m actually on the side of retaining this tag in some form since we already do differentiate between “female on male” and “male on female” (and the rest of them) to accommodate for people with specific kinks. We also have “larger X” to sort size different pairings by which way it goes. The similarity of the situation with size differences should be obvious.

@Officer Hotpants  
The images I can see aren’t.
 
Also, “extreme size difference” technically exists.

Can anyone add the “One of these things is not like the others” tag to here?  
>>2366903 (deleted)

On a few post I added a tag called “Single hoof”, which hints one hoof is shown in the picture.  
Can it stay?

A suggestion to rename the teats tag, perhaps to something like realistic udder or something that people don’t throw on every image that has huge crotchboobs and a pair of teats on them?
 
Example: Artist called this “teat version”, so of course people keep retagging it as teats. Tag names need to be somewhat representative of what their content is.
 

Not sure if this is the right place, but artist:peachiepone is alised to artist:saber-panda. However, there’s another artist with the same name: https://www.instagram.com/peachiepone/  
They appear to be unrelated. What should I do in this case?

@Background Pony #91Z0  
Seems superfluous unless the picture is just the one hoof. Even so it probably should have some other name like we do with “pictures of legs” and the like.
 
“Single-foot” is a term referring to specific gaits some horse breeds have.

@Damaged  
But given the guidelines for the teats tag, that does apply to that image. Pregnancy-level size, but still within reason.

@Brokedownandmadeone  
Agreed. Somewhat exaggerated even for right pre-partum but all in all the general size and shape of a horse udder instead of a pair of human breasts.

I’ve discovered an error.
 
pone implies best pone. It should instead be the other way around: best pone should imply pone.

@Pulse Wave  

 
Search results don’t behave like it is.

What exactly is the difference between jean shorts and denim shorts exactly? Not really seeing a difference, myself.
 
On a somewhat related note, how exactly does a girl wearing them automatically make them a tomboy?