General Tag Discussion

@Napsack  

 
A snaggle tooth isn’t a fang, so it probably shouldn’t imply fangs, and it definitely shouldn’t be aliased into it.

@Background Pony #8705  
Given that it almost purely features creatures with fangs I thought it might be appropriate. Guess not.

So, I’m honestly confused here and sorry if this isn’t the right place for this but… what exactly is rape as far as tagging goes?
 
IRL, we’re all taught that no means no, but it seems like the tagging policy doesn’t follow this rule. In fact, I’ve struggled to fully understand what the full breath is here. It’s troublesome because it’s kind of an extreme idea that can easily trigger, and even hurt people who don’t want to see it.

@JunkingJunkorJunk  
Uh… non-consensual sex? Doesn’t seem to complex to me.

@Deserter  
It looks like they got into a tag war over an image with an unwanted cumshot.

@Background Pony #176E  
Which one are we talking about? I’m guessing >>2161404

@JunkingJunkorJunk  
I can see where your confusion initially came from, but looking at the image that I suspect sparked your question, it seems pretty obvious the sex was consensual, even if the impregnation wasn’t.

@Deserter  
This one >>2161404

@Background Pony #176E  
Yeah, I figured, but it doesn’t look rape-y at all to me. Best argument you could make was that she didn’t want to cum inside her, but it doesn’t look she was trying to fight him off at all during the act.

@JunkingJunkorJunk  
Rape means non-consensual sex. The tags description has a pretty good write up of how the tag is used here.
 
Above all, please don’t tag shipping images as “Rape”. Shipping is not non-consensual.
 
And please don’t reverse staff tagging without talking with them about it first.

@Background Pony #176E  
That’s still rape though?
 
 
@Derpy Whooves
 
There’s no shipping tag on the image.
 
@Deserter
 
No mean no though. She said no and stop… this just doesn’t make sense to me. IRL this would be rape.

@JunkingJunkorJunk  
She said “Don’t cum inside” after he came inside. The guy obviously was going to do anyhow, but if we’re going by the legal definition, she should’ve set the boundaries before they started.

@JunkingJunkorJunk  

 
There actually is. Look again.

@Deserter
 
That could be said of any image though. Look, I’m not going to lie, this stuff has really, really started to bother me recently. But rape is rape, and no is no… There’s a ton of images here that should have this tag and frankly I’m scared to tag them because things seem unclear.

@Derpy Whooves
 
I swear I looked several times and didn’t see it… Alright. I give up. I’ll stop tagging things as rape.

@JunkingJunkorJunk  
Perhaps you might enjoy the site more if you added “rape, unwanted cumshot, unwanted impregnation” to your filter? That will grab the images that are clearly rape, as well as the ambiguous ones.
 
I know I have, and I do enjoy browsing the site more when I’m using that filter.

@Derpy Whooves
 
That’s kind of throwing it all under the rug though. I mean, what is rape if consent doesn’t matter in the definition? Should I just ignore it? Inconsistencies like this… confuse me.

@radpanic  
sounds really easy, lol. thanks for the advice man.

@Derpy Whooves  
Maybe we could have a catch-all tag for unwanted developments of otherwise consensual sex, and have that imply dubcon as well?

@Derpy Whooves  
Who’d have thought that filtering stuff you don’t like was a good thing? This is crazy talk!⸮

@JunkingJunkorJunk  
@Derpy Whooves  
I suggest Sleep Molestation, Molestation, Mind Control, Foalcon, Bestiality, Rape by Proxy, Tentacle Rape, and Dubious Consent to be added onto that list of filters too.

@icey wicey 1517  

 
Posting this again, wondering about a mod’s opinion on this.

@icey wicey 1517  
Obviously it should be tagged MORE as all gay is cute. :v
 
But no really it is pretty useless, and I’d rather just kill it as opposed to making variations for other sexualities, that would be absurd. If they want a personal gallery of gay images they find cute, there are actual galleries.

@icey wicey 1517
 
@LightningBolt  
So, no one oppose to nuking the “cute gay” tag, right?

@LightningBolt  
That’s what I’m thinking.
 
@Background Pony #A8E1  
Gay art is cute but the tag isn’t necessary.