General Tag Discussion

@TexasUberAlles  
Implying species tags is a generally bad idea considering someone could easily make the OC as a pony etc.

kamina glasses and kamina shades both exist but seem synonymous. Which one ought to be kept and which one ought to be aliased away?

@Background Pony #4F11  
I’d call the new tag “Kamina Sunglasses” and have both of those tags act as aliases to it.

@mjangelvortex  
@Background Pony #4F11
 
This is done, and it implies sunglasses.

@cheezedoodle  
Glad to hear that.

Pipe has been disambiguated.

I miss those puns on the characters names using other words for breasts such as Hootershy, Applerack, and Cups Cake. We should bring those back.

@ApplejackFan204  
No.

@LightningBolt  
Why not? They were great (and sexy).

@ApplejackFan204  
No. Your opinion on ‘sexiness’ doesn’t change anything.

@ApplejackFan204
 
“Busty X” is a lot easier to remember and tag than figuring out which custom play on words applies to which character and how.
 
Sucks but still.

@ApplejackFan204  
They are aliases. You can still tag them, search by them, and put them in watchlists.

Should mule and hinny be considered as a hybrid? Also pegamule.

@DR35  
Well, yes, they are.

(Kinda NSFW since most images with this tag are on NSFW pics)
 
Should the cute gay tag get nuked?
 
It seems redundant, since it seems like it’s be easier to search “gay, cute” to find those images. Plus there doesn’t seem to be a tag like this for the other orientations (eg. “cute straight”, “cute lesbian”), and the fact that only one guy seems to be going around tagging it.

@icey wicey 1517  
Yet another example of a personal tag, which are not allowed.
 
Seems to be another user who doesn’t know about galleries, to me.

 
At what point does this turn from pony to anthro given the extensive human-style muscles. Perhaps split the difference and use semi-anthro?

So…
 
Should pictures of Lyra and Bon Bon or Big Mac and Sugar Belle having sex together get tagged as Good Clean Married Sex (or Filthy Dirty Married Sex) depending on context now?

@mjangelvortex  
Ones made from now on, yes.

@The Smiling Pony  
Ok then, that makes sense.

@The Smiling Pony  
Only exception could be ones specifically before said events. Hey, premarital sex might see some use.
 
As in, we know that most of the show’s events come before either of them, so anything explicitly happening in those times.

i tend to go through the “episode needed” tag every now and then, and i can usually recognize an episode on the spot just through obscure screencaps.  
this one is tagged with “episode needed”, and i know where it comes from, but it’s from two seperate episodes. if that makes sense.  
 
this is the image in question. trixie’s eyeroll technically comes from celestial advice, as seen below  
 
but the first one is flipped, has no starlight and uses backgrounds from to change a changeling. i looked thoroughly in that episode, and trixie doesn’t make an expression like this in the episode either.  
how do i tag this one? it uses trixie’s pose from celestial advice, but it technically isn’t from that episode. should i just remove the “episode needed” tag altogether?

@The Smiling Pony  
It makes sense to me. So older ones are a no then?

@Nightmare Fuel  
It might be better to tag it with both episodes. Also, regardless of what episodes get tagged, it also needs “edited screencap”.

Should snaggletooth imply fangs, or be merged into it?