Northern 
I refuse to bend
I wonder why I’m being targeted by spammers the moment staff stops being able to respond to my points…?
It’s Funny that it’s always and only happening in places the mods have questions they don’t want to answer.
IF this ISN’T you, staff, you need to figure out how to stop this, because it looks very much, to everyone, like YOU are behind the spam and are doing it intentionally to silence people who you cannot actually respond to in a way that sounds reasonable.
Over 1000 posts in 2 minutes = someone is running a script to do this, on this site. The fact that they’re getting to do this uncontested means staff either doesn’t know what is accessing their site or condones it. Either way, that does not bode well for you. Solve the issue or people will continue to have less and less reason to trust you.
@Background Pony #DFB0
Whatever you’re doing, it only makes your side of the argument look shittier. If you’re on my side and trying to make the staff look bad, STOP. It doesn’t help anyone, or anything to use dishonest tactics. If you’re on the staff’s side, stop, because you’re acting unethically.
I want it to be clear from the OP i do not support this no matter who’s side it’s coming from. Period.
Also, hey asshole, you can’t bury this .
Or this
Or this
And as proof that there was no ‘manifesto’ posted first that is deleted this time, to counter any potential claims that the spam was NOT directly at me for my opinion, by someone against me: THIS and THIS. Spam out of nowhere, specifically designed to drown us out.
Edit: It’s happening again. This is only proving my point. And there we go, proof positive the spammer’s doing it to silence those who the staff disagrees with.
Edit: WHOEVER ON STAFF IS TRYING TO COVER UP THE SPAMMERS MOTIVES? YOU FUCKED UP. I CAUGHT YOU, DELETING ONLY THE POSTS THE SPAMMER MADE THAT DISPLAYED INTENT TO SILENCE ME AND LEAVING THE REST initially. This CANNOT be anything but intentional, these screenshots were taken seconds apart. Someone deleted the FIRST and the LAST messages, the only ones explaining the intent of the spammer, before the rest. Whoever it is on staff that is covering for or working with the spammer, you have been CAUGHT covering up. It is EITHER THAT or the SPAMMER THEMSELF has access to the tools that allow them to DELETE POSTS WITH MODERATOR TOOLS, which IMPLIES THE SPAMMER IS ONE OF YOU.
You FUCKED up and I CAUGHT you, because I was paying attention.
I also have proof, before the rest of the posts are deleted, that the first and then the last and then a small chain upwards were deleted before the second spam began, which uses a different Background Pony.
As proof that this isn’t standard procedure: here and here, the exact same spammer, not even a few moments later, but this time with a neutral message to start, instead of one that expresses that he’s on the side of the mods, and lo and behold the first message isn’t immediately deleted this time! Imagine that. I caught you. Someone on staff MUST have done that intentionally.
Edit: Also before anyone considers taking this thread down to cover their tracks, I took the liberty of archiving it, so there will always be a record of its existence.
Edit: Further proof that the BP’s in question were linked to the thread topics in question in case all posts are hidden.
Updates;
@Derpy Whooves
Explanation of which threads were hit, all of which, minus the one the moderator couldn’t remember are the specific ones where I had successfully argued my case and the moderators had stopped responding, in my opinion because they’d run out of tenable arguments.
@Derpy Whooves
Reasonable explanations as to how the modstaff could have handled this that points to the possibility of someone else explicitly reporting the spammer’s motivations.
@Derpy Whooves
A proper explanation of the spammer’s ‘manifesto’ that was deleted kicking off this whole thing. The context leads me to believe they were exclaiming, through the link in question, that they believe the alt-right is winning and therefore they must silence people on the anti-censorship side of the argument. Decide for yourself. I am convinced, at least, that we lack the evidence to confirm that the spammer was working with the staff. Someone targeting their motivations directly and forcing the mod to act could have created the same scenario. At the very least, we know that someone did something to attempt to hide the spammer’s motivation’s directly as reporting the first piece of spam and then the last was not applied consistently at all. The spammer still made the site staff’s side of the argument look bad, but not the site staff themselves.
It’s Funny that it’s always and only happening in places the mods have questions they don’t want to answer.
IF this ISN’T you, staff, you need to figure out how to stop this, because it looks very much, to everyone, like YOU are behind the spam and are doing it intentionally to silence people who you cannot actually respond to in a way that sounds reasonable.
Over 1000 posts in 2 minutes = someone is running a script to do this, on this site. The fact that they’re getting to do this uncontested means staff either doesn’t know what is accessing their site or condones it. Either way, that does not bode well for you. Solve the issue or people will continue to have less and less reason to trust you.
@Background Pony #DFB0
Whatever you’re doing, it only makes your side of the argument look shittier. If you’re on my side and trying to make the staff look bad, STOP. It doesn’t help anyone, or anything to use dishonest tactics. If you’re on the staff’s side, stop, because you’re acting unethically.
I want it to be clear from the OP i do not support this no matter who’s side it’s coming from. Period.
Also, hey asshole, you can’t bury this .
Or this
Or this
And as proof that there was no ‘manifesto’ posted first that is deleted this time, to counter any potential claims that the spam was NOT directly at me for my opinion, by someone against me: THIS and THIS. Spam out of nowhere, specifically designed to drown us out.
Edit: It’s happening again. This is only proving my point. And there we go, proof positive the spammer’s doing it to silence those who the staff disagrees with.
Edit: WHOEVER ON STAFF IS TRYING TO COVER UP THE SPAMMERS MOTIVES? YOU FUCKED UP. I CAUGHT YOU, DELETING ONLY THE POSTS THE SPAMMER MADE THAT DISPLAYED INTENT TO SILENCE ME AND LEAVING THE REST initially. This CANNOT be anything but intentional, these screenshots were taken seconds apart. Someone deleted the FIRST and the LAST messages, the only ones explaining the intent of the spammer, before the rest. Whoever it is on staff that is covering for or working with the spammer, you have been CAUGHT covering up. It is EITHER THAT or the SPAMMER THEMSELF has access to the tools that allow them to DELETE POSTS WITH MODERATOR TOOLS, which IMPLIES THE SPAMMER IS ONE OF YOU.
You FUCKED up and I CAUGHT you, because I was paying attention.
I also have proof, before the rest of the posts are deleted, that the first and then the last and then a small chain upwards were deleted before the second spam began, which uses a different Background Pony.
As proof that this isn’t standard procedure: here and here, the exact same spammer, not even a few moments later, but this time with a neutral message to start, instead of one that expresses that he’s on the side of the mods, and lo and behold the first message isn’t immediately deleted this time! Imagine that. I caught you. Someone on staff MUST have done that intentionally.
Edit: Also before anyone considers taking this thread down to cover their tracks, I took the liberty of archiving it, so there will always be a record of its existence.
Edit: Further proof that the BP’s in question were linked to the thread topics in question in case all posts are hidden.
Updates;
@Derpy Whooves
Explanation of which threads were hit, all of which, minus the one the moderator couldn’t remember are the specific ones where I had successfully argued my case and the moderators had stopped responding, in my opinion because they’d run out of tenable arguments.
@Derpy Whooves
Reasonable explanations as to how the modstaff could have handled this that points to the possibility of someone else explicitly reporting the spammer’s motivations.
@Derpy Whooves
A proper explanation of the spammer’s ‘manifesto’ that was deleted kicking off this whole thing. The context leads me to believe they were exclaiming, through the link in question, that they believe the alt-right is winning and therefore they must silence people on the anti-censorship side of the argument. Decide for yourself. I am convinced, at least, that we lack the evidence to confirm that the spammer was working with the staff. Someone targeting their motivations directly and forcing the mod to act could have created the same scenario. At the very least, we know that someone did something to attempt to hide the spammer’s motivation’s directly as reporting the first piece of spam and then the last was not applied consistently at all. The spammer still made the site staff’s side of the argument look bad, but not the site staff themselves.
