@Background Pony #5C8B
The proposed new rules look good.It’s the examples of application of said rules given by Princess Luna that are worrying people. Me included.
Do not post content whose only apparent purpose is inciting anger, arguments, or controversy. This rule does not apply to things we like, even if they get hundreds of people fighting about them
The image itself would be looked at in isolation (not the artist, not the votes, not the comments) and it’d be looked at whether it has artistic reasons, or if the art there is just in service of some message that would likely make the average person react angrily, especially things to do with current events that are shocking etc.
@Moonatik
The image itself would be looked at in isolation (not the artist, not the votes, not the comments) and it’d be looked at whether it has artistic reasons, or if the art there is just in service of some message that would likely make the average person react angrily, especially things to do with current events that are shocking etc.
Looked at by whom? People who want to find a reason to get mad at an image will always find one, regardless of artist, votes etc. You’d have to literally look inside the artists head to find the true intentions behind the picture
Therefore, what I think should matter is the impact an image has. If it makes the vast majority of people who view it happy or horny then I don’t see a problem. I believe it was for this purpose that the hide button was created, no?
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Locked
Lock reason: Changes announced