Pirill
🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸
First off, big thanks for the opportunity of giving some input for the first time in this whole mess, it’s a breath of fresh air and very much appreciated. Was it so hard to do that from the get go? :P
Talking exclusively about the sample images I agree with your internal assessment with some hesitation towards the first and fourth Not Rule #0 ones, although I do see the reasoning for them being in that category. I would like to see some a more diverse example of other potential hateful images not directly related to nazism which might fall under the new ruling but considering the main issue at hand I’m more than happy with this compromise, especially if it puts an end to the whole drama.
EDIT: I’d also like to mention that for images that are borderline Rule #0, authorial intent should be carefully considered and one option that might alleviate some concerns about abusive rulings would be to submit them to a vote and possibly mention the vote result on the removal for the sake of transparency.
Talking exclusively about the sample images I agree with your internal assessment with some hesitation towards the first and fourth Not Rule #0 ones, although I do see the reasoning for them being in that category. I would like to see some a more diverse example of other potential hateful images not directly related to nazism which might fall under the new ruling but considering the main issue at hand I’m more than happy with this compromise, especially if it puts an end to the whole drama.
EDIT: I’d also like to mention that for images that are borderline Rule #0, authorial intent should be carefully considered and one option that might alleviate some concerns about abusive rulings would be to submit them to a vote and possibly mention the vote result on the removal for the sake of transparency.