And please add a warning when linking to NSFW images.
This does not apply to site bugs, I just noticed that someone is engaged in wrecking - someone put a lot of extra tags. I don’t know where to write about this
https://derpibooru.org/images/3007845
@chieftek
It’s tag vandalism. Not a bug, but not a desirable thing either.
11,000 tag changes?! That’s…crazy. Just crazy 😳🤯😫
11,000 tag changes?! That’s…crazy. Just crazy 😳🤯😫Situation with this tag spammer is a lot worse than you may think at first sight, check for example changes story of oc:bay breeze tag, someone constantly adding thousands of most popular ‘cute’ tags for as many shocking NSFW images as they can find.
Additionally, any image with more than ~1000 tags seems to get automatically tag/source locked, presumably for that exact reason.
Additionally, any image with more than ~1000 tags seems to get automatically tag/source locked, presumably for that exact reason.Seems like the auto-lock should kick in WAY before a thousand tags. Heck, it should be trivial to make it rate-dependent, as well, e.g. more than X tag changes in Y minutes/hours/days – probably only needed for existing images, not new ones.
This does not apply to site bugs,
tags. I don’t know where to write about this
Heck, it should be trivial to make it rate-dependent, as well, e.g. more than X tag changes in Y minutes/hours/days – probably only needed for existing images, not new ones.I know it’d ruffle feathers, but perhaps differing rates for existing users vs BgPs as well, since the latter are almost always the ones behind these issues?
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!