My piece was taken down?

Image has been linked below, but art I did was taken down. I can only assume it was because it was ACAB, but my other two acab pieces as well as ones done by others are still up?
 
I’m really just not sure… why? It doesn’t violate any rules, considering the heinous things people are allowed to post here.
 
Regardless of how you feel about the police system, you guys supposedly advocate for free speech. Thats why images that are pro-fascism are allowed to stay up.
 
This is a redraw specifically to see my progress as an artist grow. I didnt make this specifically to instigate a fight with anyone. I don’t see why it was taken down.
 
Please don’t try to argue in this thread, I don’t care how you feel about the subject matter. Dont DM me about it, either. I just want to know why my art was taken down.
 

@glowfangs  
I’d hazard a guess that it’s not because “ACAB”, but the added line after it that goes beyond “the current institutions of law enforcement are fundamentally flawed” and into “actually, the specific individuals you’re related to are bad people”; that doesn’t sound like calling for police reform, but just trying to insult people and make them mad, which is rule #0 stuff.

@The Smiling Pony  
I mean… I get that, I guess, but posts calling the general reader slurs stay up just fine?

@glowfangs  
I imagine those are going to depend a lot on the image’s context; Fluttershy in leather calling the viewer “pathetic” is a kink thing, and a cute Twilight smiling and saying “You’re stupid!” is more of a joke or a reaction image at worst.
 
A message that earnestly says something like “The French are cowards”, without there being any context for it being a joke, is most likely going to be interpreted as an attempt to insult or denigrate people and dinged for #0.
 
_{^{No offence to any Frenchies, it’s just the laziest example I could come up with}}

@The Smiling Pony  
im talking more like anon pony calling the viewer the n-word, or f/ggot (im gay, i can say it, lol). i see that kind of stuff all the time and it doesnt get taken down. mine is no different?  
people on this site post child porn and then act like me saying their cop uncle might not be a good person is the more heinous post. okay lol

@glowfangs  
If there are other examples of images saying that people’s relations are bastards because of their jobs, I don’t think we’re aware of them. So, please report them so we can look at them.
 
But if it’s just a drawing of a pony saying a word, especially if it’s memetic like the “Faggot” memes where the pony saying Faggot is presumed to also be a Faggot, then that’s very different then saying something like “your father is a bastard because of his job”.
 
So, please report some of the images you are referring to.
 
And if you’re aware of images (whether that is a photograph or a drawing) on the site that show what can reasonably be considered human children in sexual situations please report them immediately - those are not permitted on this site and we delete them and ban the uploaders as soon as we are aware of them.

@glowfangs  
The vast majority of such images, that I could see at least, are reaction images that use vulgarities as generic insults, and as far as I’m aware there aren’t any that use the “n word”. “Your father in particular is a shitty person” is a very different message than “lol ur gay” as a joke reaction to something stupid. If you see an image that has a more directed serious insult, like “people that drive toyotas are fags”, then you should report it.
 
 
Aside, I’m going to go ahead and assume you’re conflating foalcon with child porn. Regardless of how unrelated that is to this topic (particularly considering you yourself made a remark of “Please don’t try to argue in this thread, I don’t care how you feel about the subject matter”), I’d ask that not you use that term when you mean to say “drawn smut of underage fictional horses”; lolicon (anthro or humanized) is against the rules here and gets people banned, and actual child porn is extremely forbidden and gets addresses referred to the authorities. Trying to equate those things, apart from being a really bad faith argumentative tactic, takes away the abhorrence of what CP is by putting it in the same bucket as fictional doodles.