Barhandar 
"[@SerenePony":](/forums/meta/topics/feature-suggestions-and-discussion?post_id=4856991#post_4856991
[bq])
> Read through it myself, now I'm wondering if everyone else read this before complaining about the site.[/bq]
Given the usual complaints (e.g. izzy's "filters won't work if those who post don't tag correctly"), they didn't and are assuming Derpi's tagging works like tagging on all other sites (e.g. izzy's "filters won't work if those who post don't tag correctly").
And tagging on literally all other sites is_*unbelievably_* bad in comparison. Tags stuffed into some tiny corner of the UI, tags only modifiable by uploader, no standardisation whatsoever, search that lumps tags and text together or only works on limited quantity of tags, et cetera.
[bq]
> I guess the assumption of common sense is out the window. What about a more detailed disclaimer? Would that be a good idea?[/bq]
I think so, yeah. Mention personal responsibility so that anyone complaining can be pointed at filters and rule 4.
(twi|pony)booru.org
[bq]
> Read through it myself, now I'm wondering if everyone else read this before complaining about the site.
Given the usual complaints (e.g. izzy's "filters won't work if those who post don't tag correctly"), they didn't and are assuming Derpi's tagging works like tagging on all other sites
And tagging on literally all other sites is
[bq]
> I guess the assumption of common sense is out the window. What about a more detailed disclaimer? Would that be a good idea?
I think so, yeah. Mention personal responsibility so that anyone complaining can be pointed at filters and rule 4.