Viewing last 25 versions of post by Exedrus in topic Feature suggestions and discussion [READ THE FIRST POST]

"[@byte[]":](/meta/feature-suggestions-and-discussion/post/2925406#post_2925406
)  
>I don’t suppose you can see the problem here?


 
This seems reasonable, assuming there isn't some technical limitation preventing this. (Is spoiler handling done client-side?)


 
I mean, ideally people could label each line so the text could be more concise, but failing that this would at least give them some context before they had to resort to a scroll-over to scan the tags.


 
Edit: Seems like you might also be able to make it just display the first line/outer-or-clause that matches rather than the shortest? Then people could just order them according to how important each individual check is.

"@byte[]":/meta/feature-suggestions-and-discussion/post/2925406#post_2925406
>I don’t suppose you can see the problem here?

This seems reasonable, assuming there isn't some technical limitation preventing this. (Is spoiler handling done client-side?)

I mean, ideally people could label each line so the text could be more concise, but failing that this would at least give them some context before they had to resort to a scroll-over to scan the tags.

Edit: Seems like you might also be able to make it just display the first line that matches rather than the shortest? Then people could just order them according to how important each individual check is.

"@byte[]":/meta/feature-suggestions-and-discussion/post/2925406#post_2925406
>I don’t suppose you can see the problem here?

This seems reasonable, assuming there isn't some technical limitation preventing this. (Is spoiler handling done client-side?)

I mean, ideally people could label each line so the text could be more concise, but failing that this would at least give them some context before they had to resort to a scroll-over to scan the tags.