@Background Pony #7A74
It’s like there’s no connection between what you say at one point and what you say to responses to your comments just a few moments later. In one post you’re all “logic and science” then in the next there’s nothing but deeply personal concerns, lamenting the imagined suffering of unknown others.
Or is it you suffering?
Odds are you’ll reply to this with an entirely different vector, as if it’s yet another entirely different conversation with an entirely different person.
That, for me, is a part of why your posts all seem composed from other sources. They all “sound good” as sound bites, but it’s just a collage of what others said, with no editor making sure it all is a coherent line of thought.
And you throw in unrelated things like “term “Aspergers’’ is no longer in use” as it you’re correcting something that I said that was wrong, which would normally serve as a sign of wisdom on your part and maybe, through exposing my own slip-up, make your point. But no one in this thread has mentioned Aspergers for 2 years aside from yourself - so you’re just creating things to be right about that no one else was even discussing. Or defining a component of a word as if that somehow proves you’re too clever to be a transphobe, while apparently being entirely ignorant that Transphobia does not describe a phobia as defined in clinical psychology, but has a meaning and usage that parallels xenophobia.
You’re fixing things that weren’t broke, and defining parts of classical compounds without replying to the actual point being made, like someone who wants to give the appearance of being correct and knowledgeable, without ever actually acknowledging or even apparently comprehending the other person’s point.
I, as always, await your copy/pasted collage-art reply, along with its usual sesquipedalian loquaciousness and utter disregard for anything anyone was actually talking about.