H.B. 1 fleshes out existing laws against blocking streets as part of protests and increases penalties for anybody who commits battery or similar violent crimes as part of a riot.[
It establishes a minimum six-month jail sentence for anybody convicted of battery against a police officer as part of a riot.
It creates a new crime—mob intimidation—which is defined as two or more people attempting to use or threatening force “to compel or induce, or attempt to compel or induce another person to do or refrain from doing any act or to assume, abandon, or maintain a particular viewpoint against his or her will,” punishable as a first-degree misdemeanor (which entails up to a year in jail and up to a $1,000 fine).
It establishes that anybody convicted of vandalizing or destroying historic property or a memorial is committing a felony, with a possible prison sentence of up to 15 years and a fine of up to $10,000, as well as restitution orders.
H.B. 1 further establishes a mandate that municipalities must respond to protect people and their property during a riot or any unlawful assembly. Failure to do so strips the municipality itself of civil immunity and opens it up to lawsuits for damages.
It gives a commission in the governor’s office veto power over municipalities within the state if they attempt to reduce the budget of their own police departments.
It prohibits releasing anybody arrested for certain crimes like theft or assault during a riot until the arrested person has appeared before a magistrate.
It creates a new crime of “cyberintimidation by publication,” making it unlawful to electronically publish somebody’s personal identification information with the intent to (or with the intent that a third party will) incite violence against the person, harass the person, or place “such person in reasonable fear of bodily harm.” This section makes no distinction between private citizens or government workers or even elected political figures. Violating the law is a first-degree misdemeanor (up to a year in jail and up to a $1,000 fine).
It creates an affirmative defense for anybody taken to civil court over injury, damage, or death if it is the result of a participant in the lawsuit engaging in rioting. This part of the law has been presented in the press as granting legal immunity to people who run over protesters.
The particularly free speech troublesome ones are in bold. What most conservatives don’t understand is that adding new laws will do little to counteract the rioting as most of the worst areas were from blue states that weren’t using what powers they
had already at their disposal out of fear and idiocy (but it is their choice, as states have the power of police and the feds should not get involved unless absolutely necessary) I suppose you might sell me on the ones overruling towns but not much else as it is only a expansion of power that will be used against you later. Especially that “cyberintimidation by publication” which even in a limited form could have a chilling effect upon free speech.
Now, I will say this, I will take a look at the law myself and see if Reason is overplaying it. I know Ron has a target on his head for being possibly the next GOP nominee if Trump doesn’t run but they don’t
usually conclude with the mainstream media to that level and usually are pretty good on at least explaining their positions on policing in good faith.
@Zincy
I am more of the position that we should get rid of the majority of our tax deductions and exceptions but I’ll admit that is a interesting idea.
@CaptainXtra
I have been trying but it frequency gets pushed aside for other things.
I’m just here continuing to wonder why people here on a EU based site talk about US based politics 90% of the time.
Even with a lot of Americans you’d think you see a bit more international politics.
@Violet Rose in The Rain
Going after Trump? that is punching up, Journalist going after a lone shitposter is
them punching down. Though I don’t even agree with such a simple power dynamics description of the situation.
Journalist, like anybody else, deserve some humanity. I believe you can go to far with anybody, even bankers, stock brokers, etc, but if we were to muzzle ourselves to the whims of their fragile egos then be simply slaves to people who don’t have our best interest at heart.
If all the “counterculture” left that we celebrate getting us to this point, so often perverted, edgy, and violent directed at a whole host of once untouchable figures and concepts can’t handle journalist getting dunked on by memes than they have failed.