Claudia Sheinbaum, for her part, hasn’t been a pushover either. NAFTA is bound to see a lot of turbulence soon.
My theory is that sectors of the American ruling class see the recent industrialization of Mexico and its gradual slipping out of the US orbit with concern for the future of their dominance over the area. Knowing how they often apply the same “containment” strategy to their own rivals (see, Russia wrt Ukraine and China wrt some of its neighbors, such as Taiwan), there is palpable fear that the US’ rivals, in seeing chances for diplomatic bargaining with Washington slip away, could finance an estrangement between Mexico and the US and create a hostile military force on their very doorstep. Ensuring US control over the waterways in the Caribbean and the American portion of the Pacific could secure American hegemony over a sector of the New World in the middle of a time period in which US global dominance seems less secure and more threatened than before, or so Trump and his acolytes think.
Today they blare on and on about the drug cartels being such a force, but if things go wrong, it could be the Mexican government itself. Trump’s tendency to lump both of them in the same box, his professed “doctrine” for transactional diplomacy and his musing in a rally last year about installing a version of Israel’s Iron Dome on the US-Mexico border could be a sign of how things are changing, though i don’t believe he’s the prime mover of this sort of thing himself.
Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) will introduce a bill that would authorize the president to purchase the Panama Canal and put it under U.S. control, an acquisition that President-elect Trump has been pushing over the last several weeks.Johnson plans to introduce the “Panama Canal Repurchase Act” on Thursday, The Hill has learned.“President Trump is right to consider repurchasing the Panama Canal. China’s interest in and presence around the canal is a cause for concern,” Johnson said in a statement. “America must project strength abroad – owning and operating the Panama Canal might be an important step towards a stronger America and a more secure globe.”The bill would authorize the president, in coordination with the Secretary of State, to “initiate and conduct negotiations with appropriate counterparts of the Government of the Republic of Panama to reacquire the Panama Canal for the symbolic amount of $1,” according to draft text shared with The Hill.The $1 amount is an apparent reference to a symbolic sale of the canal that was accompanied by numerous other provisions in the Carter-Torrijos Treaties signed in 1977 that transferred control of the canal to Panama. Trump in December had complained that about the deal signed by former President Carter, saying that he “foolishly gave it away, for One Dollar.”The bill also directs the president to submit a report to Congress within 180 days of passage “detailing the progress of the negotiations” as well as the “potential challenges” and “anticipated outcomes.” Fox News first reported Johnson’s plans to introduce the bill.Trump on Tuesday refused to commit to not using the U.S. military to take control of the Panama Canal.“I’m not going to commit to that. It might be that you have to do something,” Trump said in a press conference from Mar-a-Lago. “Look, the Panama Canal is vital to our country, it’s being operated by China, China. And we gave the Panama Canal to Panama, we didn’t give it to China.”Despite Johnson’s bill, the idea of the U.S. taking control of the Panama Canal — as well as acquiring Greenland — is facing skepticism from other Capitol Hill Republicans.“I think he was speaking aspirationally,” Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) said recently about Trump’s ambitions of taking control of the Panama Canal and Greenland.
Trump in December had complained that about the deal signed by former President Carter, saying that he “foolishly gave it away, for One Dollar.”
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!