How slow/fast is the lawsuit system in the EU?
Don't blame me, I voted for the other guy. (Politics General)
@CaptainXtra
Can’t be much faster than the US’ legal system.
Can’t be much faster than the US’ legal system.
@Goku Black
I ask because the TERREG has a fair chance of being taken down in court but apparently the case would take “a long time”.
Long as in six months? A year?
How long do these ECJ cases take?
I ask because the TERREG has a fair chance of being taken down in court but apparently the case would take “a long time”.
Long as in six months? A year?
How long do these ECJ cases take?
The rise of Asian Hate Crimes is appalling to me, and it was all thanks to Trump’s rhetoric a year ago.
Background Pony #7EFA
@NitroFury
why?
why?
@NitroFury
Have to keep it about Trump, eh?
Just ignore the wokes “Asians are diet whites” rhetoric. Most of it is your racist camp.
Have to keep it about Trump, eh?
Just ignore the wokes “Asians are diet whites” rhetoric. Most of it is your racist camp.
@silbasa
Imagine defending homophobia and climate change denial as the norm and being spooked by some arguably misguided stances on diversity as “the end of western civilization”. This is what modern day conservatism does to your brain, folks.
@CaptainXtra
According to the CJEU’s judicial activity report for 2019 (the most recent I could find), the average duration of proceedings was 15.5 months for preliminary rulings, 19.1 months for direct actions and 11.1 months for appeals (keep in mind that the ECJ has over a thousand of pending cases to review in a given year).
@Backgroundpony
It’s directly linked to the COVID pandemic and Trump’s insistence to refer it as the “China virus”. Such sentiments didn’t go away with him out of office.
Imagine defending homophobia and climate change denial as the norm and being spooked by some arguably misguided stances on diversity as “the end of western civilization”. This is what modern day conservatism does to your brain, folks.
@CaptainXtra
According to the CJEU’s judicial activity report for 2019 (the most recent I could find), the average duration of proceedings was 15.5 months for preliminary rulings, 19.1 months for direct actions and 11.1 months for appeals (keep in mind that the ECJ has over a thousand of pending cases to review in a given year).
@Backgroundpony
It’s directly linked to the COVID pandemic and Trump’s insistence to refer it as the “China virus”. Such sentiments didn’t go away with him out of office.
@Ereiam
Trump insistence to call it China virus 1year
wokes anti asian rhetoric 5+ years
Yeah you did more harm.
Trump insistence to call it China virus 1year
wokes anti asian rhetoric 5+ years
Yeah you did more harm.
@Ereiam
“15.5 months for preliminary rulings, 19.1 months for direct actions and 11.1 months for appeals”
That’s the average per case?
“15.5 months for preliminary rulings, 19.1 months for direct actions and 11.1 months for appeals”
That’s the average per case?
@Background Pony #7EFA
True. But it still seems like a recipe for trouble. Dunno if I can think of a better idea, though…
True. But it still seems like a recipe for trouble. Dunno if I can think of a better idea, though…
So, Trump has launch his own Social Media app, which is going be a giant flop.
@NitroFury
Get some help.
The last 4years have melted your brain.
No one cares if or if an app fails.
Get some help.
The last 4years have melted your brain.
No one cares if or if an app fails.
@Backgroundpony
If you don’t like it, you can leave.
If you don’t like it, you can leave.
@NitroFury
No, I am seriously worried about you.
No, I am seriously worried about you.
@Backgroundpony
Honestly, I think YOU’RE the one who needs help.
Honestly, I think YOU’RE the one who needs help.
@Backgroundpony
Equating duration with impact is idiotic. I don’t even have any idea what that “woke anti asian rhetoric” you’re blathering about is supposed to be.
Equating duration with impact is idiotic. I don’t even have any idea what that “woke anti asian rhetoric” you’re blathering about is supposed to be.
@Penguin Dragneel
Well, thanks for your concern, but I am not the one who has an obsessive hate boner for a single person or group
Well, thanks for your concern, but I am not the one who has an obsessive hate boner for a single person or group
@CaptainXtra
Very slow. Decisions sometimes take years and then the country’s take years to implement laws/decisions into practice.
@NitroFury
How much has it risen? Are we talking about more drummed up twitter hysteria here over a few cases?
@Ereiam
Some good, some bad in there. On your side it’s mostly bad.
Very slow. Decisions sometimes take years and then the country’s take years to implement laws/decisions into practice.
@NitroFury
How much has it risen? Are we talking about more drummed up twitter hysteria here over a few cases?
@Ereiam
Some good, some bad in there. On your side it’s mostly bad.
I think I can safely say that as someone who is neither a conservative, nor is necessarily right-wing, alt-right, “alt-lite”, and/or far-right, overall, both politically, socially, economically, etc., this new comic posted by StoneToss (of whom there is still no actual proof that he is actually, indisputably a Nazi) once again cements his reputation as someone who, in most cases that I have seen so far (and there’s a pretty good amount of them that I have, believe me), consistently never misses.
I think this post goes into detail on how StoneToss actually is a nazi.
Background Pony #7EFA
@Latecomer
Sadly when the recipe includes humans their can be, and usually is, trouble.
Sadly when the recipe includes humans their can be, and usually is, trouble.
@Backgroundpony
Well neither is Nitro, or anyone else here (with a few exceptions).
Well neither is Nitro, or anyone else here (with a few exceptions).
A new poll out of Virginia spells even more trouble for Republicans.
The Wason Center, out of CNU’s public policy department, did a poll of ideology vs. policy in VA.
They found that while a majority of Virginians ranked themselves as ideologically moderate, averaging a 5.83 on a 10 point “Liberal to Conservative” scale, they actually overwhelmingly favored democratic policies. These included Medicare for all, pathways to citizenship, environmentally friendly policies, and wage increases. The poll also found that independents, VAs largest voting bloc, sided heavy with dems in their voting habits.
This poll was of the entire state, not just NOVA.
This poll shows why Trump and Co. did, and are doing, so poorly in VA. It also dispels a conservative talking point they’ve had recently. That the newly empowered dems did “too much too fast”. As it turns out, the stuff they did was fairly popular.
Who knew expanding health care access, voting rights, wage increases, and a clean environment would be popular?
The Wason Center, out of CNU’s public policy department, did a poll of ideology vs. policy in VA.
They found that while a majority of Virginians ranked themselves as ideologically moderate, averaging a 5.83 on a 10 point “Liberal to Conservative” scale, they actually overwhelmingly favored democratic policies. These included Medicare for all, pathways to citizenship, environmentally friendly policies, and wage increases. The poll also found that independents, VAs largest voting bloc, sided heavy with dems in their voting habits.
This poll was of the entire state, not just NOVA.
This poll shows why Trump and Co. did, and are doing, so poorly in VA. It also dispels a conservative talking point they’ve had recently. That the newly empowered dems did “too much too fast”. As it turns out, the stuff they did was fairly popular.
Who knew expanding health care access, voting rights, wage increases, and a clean environment would be popular?
@Zincy
I will never again trust polls of any kind.
I will never again trust polls of any kind.
@MagpulPony
Yeah, science is for commies.
Yeah, science is for commies.
@MagpulPony
Polls are only as good as their design, and the design is only as good as the designer.
You know the polls in 2020, generally speaking, weren’t that far off. Local polls in Iowe and Ohio showed dems in trouble, scoring within the margins, and they went on to lose both states. Polls for Biden in Georgia showed him just slightly above the margin, and he went on to win. Margins are important, as is sample size, how the data is collected, aggregation, how the questions are worded, etc.
The problem is not the polls, its idiots who cannot read them.
Leading by 3 points on a poll with a margin of error +/- 5 is not a real lead, statistically speaking. The media will report it as such, and idiots will believe it as such, but the poll clearly does not say so.
And besides that, a good poll is taken within context. This poll is to be taken within the context of stark demographics changes, recent voting trends, redistricting, and other public polling data to create a concrete picture. Only a fool relies on one or two polls to come to a conclusion. Like Trump did every time he latched onto one poll that showed him leading by 6 or 7 points.
The problem is not the science, it is the idiots.
Polls are only as good as their design, and the design is only as good as the designer.
You know the polls in 2020, generally speaking, weren’t that far off. Local polls in Iowe and Ohio showed dems in trouble, scoring within the margins, and they went on to lose both states. Polls for Biden in Georgia showed him just slightly above the margin, and he went on to win. Margins are important, as is sample size, how the data is collected, aggregation, how the questions are worded, etc.
The problem is not the polls, its idiots who cannot read them.
Leading by 3 points on a poll with a margin of error +/- 5 is not a real lead, statistically speaking. The media will report it as such, and idiots will believe it as such, but the poll clearly does not say so.
And besides that, a good poll is taken within context. This poll is to be taken within the context of stark demographics changes, recent voting trends, redistricting, and other public polling data to create a concrete picture. Only a fool relies on one or two polls to come to a conclusion. Like Trump did every time he latched onto one poll that showed him leading by 6 or 7 points.
The problem is not the science, it is the idiots.
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!