Patachu 
"[@Hollowfox Jaeger":](/forums/generals/topics/tartarus?post_id=4747226#post_4747226
)
That's a good question.
Is it better to die of an old age and live as a serf, a slave, in torment than dying younger fighting and be remembered that way in a theoretical WWIII. It's a bit what I meant by fear versus rage to resist at the peril of our life, and if it works, you can die happily.
Never believe in afterlife, transhumanism resurrection and other religious claims, just consider like; you exist for a time given.
Of course no one wants to die, but indeed we never choose how to die. So I'm seconding Eriam here, let's live the best we can.
[@The Smiling Pony](/forums/generals/topics/tartarus?post_id=4750647#post_4750647)
Except those "less populated regions" also exist. When say, an overpopulated place with 10% of the population vote for their own interests, this is exactly why here, by example we end up with a president like Macron. This is why indeed most systems are biased and does not represent at all the integrality of the population, and we all end with unpopular presidents.
It's impossible to get everyone to agree with the elected guy, the best would be one that gets elected at about 80% or 90%. There we are closer to a popular consensus. No system is perfect, one could be a total dictatorship where the opposition is simply silenced and permanently kalashnikovified.
That's a good question.
Is it better to die of an old age and live as a serf, a slave, in torment than dying younger fighting and be remembered that way in a theoretical WWIII. It's a bit what I meant by fear versus rage to resist at the peril of our life, and if it works, you can die happily.
Never believe in afterlife, transhumanism resurrection and other religious claims, just consider like; you exist for a time given.
Of course no one wants to die, but indeed we never choose how to die. So I'm seconding Eriam here, let's live the best we can.
[@The Smiling Pony](/forums/generals/topics/tartarus?post_id=4750647#post_4750647)
Except those "less populated regions" also exist. When say, an overpopulated place with 10% of the population vote for their own interests, this is exactly why here, by example we end up with a president like Macron. This is why indeed most systems are biased and does not represent at all the integrality of the population, and we all end with unpopular presidents.
It's impossible to get everyone to agree with the elected guy, the best would be one that gets elected at about 80% or 90%. There we are closer to a popular consensus. No system is perfect, one could be a total dictatorship where the opposition is simply silenced and permanently kalashnikovified.