HeadlessHorselessHorseman
"[@Fluttershy Studios":](/generals/tartarus/post/3325498#post_3325498
)
But you seemed to be speaking up in defense of Commune's assertion that codified human rights imply that humans need to be protected from each other "forever".
"
[@Fluttershy Studios":](/generals/tartarus/post/3325498#post_3325498
[bq="Fluttershy) Studios"]
>" [@HeadlessHorselessHorseman":](/generals/tartarus/post/3325274#post_3325274
[bq])
>
> > "Indefinitely" still isn’t "forever".[/bq]
>
> I didn't say indefinitely means forever.
[bq]
>
> > And why does there have to be a finite number of offenders and punishers?[/bq]
>
> If punishers consisted of all people, then there are no offenders.
> If offenders consisted of all people, then there are no punishers.[/bq]
All people can't be the punisher_*at the same time_*, but I was under the impression that you were saying there was a limit to how many punishers there could be over a period of time.
But you seemed to be speaking up in defense of Commune's assertion that codified human rights imply that humans need to be protected from each other "forever".
"
[@Fluttershy Studios
[bq="Fluttershy
>
[bq]
>
> > "Indefinitely" still isn’t "forever".
>
> I didn't say indefinitely means forever.
[bq]
>
> > And why does there have to be a finite number of offenders and punishers?
>
> If punishers consisted of all people, then there are no offenders.
> If offenders consisted of all people, then there are no punishers.
All people can't be the punisher