Stupid stuff that comes to mind that we want to post

BROKE:  

 
WOKE:  

@tehwatever  
“Two for flinching, infidel!”

This has always bothered me.
 
“Inaccurate” = not accurate.  
“Inaccessible” = not accessible.  
“Invaluable” = extremely valuable.
 
Whut?

@TheHappySpaceman  
Inflammable.

@TheHappySpaceman
 
@Meanlucario  
What a country!

@TheHappySpaceman
 
@Meanlucario
 
@Darth Prime
 
Indivisible
 
I recommend the game; it’s fun.

@TheHappySpaceman  
Inexcusable!

@TheHappySpaceman  
To be fair:  
Extremely valuable is kinda inaccurate if you want to convey “having a really high price / is worth a lot of money.”
 
Valueable imo, means “it can be valued” and to value something is to set a price on it, usually on a give scale and against a reference, in order to give it a fair price.
 
Something invaluable means that its value is outside of said scale and it is incomparable against the references. It may or may not be, actually worthless.
 
Since you can’t appraise an invaluable object, the assumption is then, that it must be extremely rare and therefore of very high price, but nobody knows how high.
 
Extremely valuable is therefore, I think, should NOT refer to highly priced and expensive items but rather on items that can be valued by anyone, on any scale, in any market.

Confession time: On the first episode of Sonic X, I thought that it was a new Digimon series because I thought Big the Cat was a Digimon. No, really, I thought it was Digimon when I was a kid the first time I saw Sonic X.

@tehwatever  

 
Either way you use it, if you make that sign in the Middle East, Brazil, Belarus and Russia, You are SCREWED

So, what’s bad about the snake house in Harry Potter? Being part of the snake teams sounds cool to me.

@Meanlucario  
They’re supremacist, conniving, backstabbing and almost uniformly assholes.
 
That Voldemort came from their house is practically an afterthought.

@WyrmSpawN  
Seeing how poorly Dumbledore is running it, I’m not convinced that Voldemort isn’t just going to extreme lengths to force a positive change for Hogwarts (I mean, it says something when his takeover has a smaller body count than a normal year for Hogwarts).

@Meanlucario  
For the genetic ‘purity’ and supremacy of magic users? That’s a positive change?

@WyrmSpawN  
Hey, it forced a change in the system. Also, if a house is compose of nothing but “supremacist, conniving, backstabbing and almost uniformly assholes,” than I can’t help but blame the ones in charge for putting one and one together that the members of that house being evil.

@Meanlucario  
The whole house system is suspect anyway. Dividing people up by temperament. The nerds, jocks, preppies, and druggies should be helping each other out, not cordoned off into their own little bubbles. That was an explicit act of villainy when Sunset Shimmer did it, but in Harry-Potter-Land it’s just how things are.
 
They need a Twilight Sparkle.

@Meanlucario  
@Background Human  
I’ve heard the houses are based on a personal trait, and Slytherin’s trait is ambition, also probably others. That’s why there are so many villains in Slytherin, they’re willing to do anything to achieve their goal.

@TheHappySpaceman  
I can’t, Steven. Because I don’t even know what “catgirls” are…

BROKE YO MAMA!

@TheHappySpaceman
 
@MagpulPony  

@NitroFury  
Oh okay. Yeah, that’s a furry. Only Furry things I kinda like are Protogens, and LightningBolt had to tell me that’s what they even are.

Things will be happening very very differently going forward.

@TheHappySpaceman  
Yep.