Stupid stuff that comes to mind that we want to post
TheHappySpaceman 
Sweet F.A.
@Jarkes
There’s a well-known conspiracy theory saying that the reason the Beatles actually quit touring was because Paul McCartney died in 1968, and that the Paul McCartney who formed the Wings was an imposter. Stupid, I know.
TheHappySpaceman
Sweet F.A.
@Jarkes
Yeah. I never got it myself. I mean, of all the members, why Paul? It would’ve been just as likely that one of the other members died.
Yeah. I never got it myself. I mean, of all the members, why Paul? It would’ve been just as likely that one of the other members died.
Jarkes 
GOKAAAAI... SILVER!
@TheHappySpaceman
I also can never remember the name of the drummer they had before Ringo (which just goes to show how much more well-known Ringo was).
I also can never remember the name of the drummer they had before Ringo (which just goes to show how much more well-known Ringo was).
TheHappySpaceman
Sweet F.A.
@TheMagpulPone
Don’t give up! You got a reason to live!
@Wiimeiser
Maybe? Post-Beatles Paul McCartney did focus more heavily on softer ballads and “silly love songs” than he did during his time in The Beatles.
@Jarkes
Pete Best.
Don’t give up! You got a reason to live!
@Wiimeiser
Maybe? Post-Beatles Paul McCartney did focus more heavily on softer ballads and “silly love songs” than he did during his time in The Beatles.
@Jarkes
Pete Best.
Don't 
Get up and Jump
Reminder that The Rolling Stones kicked out a member for being “not handsome enough” while the Beatles kicked out their most handsome member for being shit, and yet the Rolling Stones are supposed to be the “Edgier Less corporate band”
Don't
Get up and Jump
@TheHappySpaceman
Ian Stewart
Mick Taylor on the other hand left on his because he thought The other members were shitty on a technical level and that the Rollings Stones was holding him back artistically, also because Keith was a junkie asshole
Ian Stewart
Mick Taylor on the other hand left on his because he thought The other members were shitty on a technical level and that the Rollings Stones was holding him back artistically, also because Keith was a junkie asshole
Don't
Get up and Jump
It’s pretty hilarious how The rolling stones and Beatles managed to make the most critically acclaimed albums despite not knowing anything about Music Theory
TheHappySpaceman
Sweet F.A.
@Broken Adam
The main thing anyone needs to know about music theory is that 95% of music breaks the “rules” of music theory.
The main thing anyone needs to know about music theory is that 95% of music breaks the “rules” of music theory.
Don't
Get up and Jump
@TheHappySpaceman
Only conservative ones taught by assholes who refuse to accept that the world changed since the 1700’s, a lot of theories are actually pretty liberal, just not ones taught in music universities
Only conservative ones taught by assholes who refuse to accept that the world changed since the 1700’s, a lot of theories are actually pretty liberal, just not ones taught in music universities
ЅℰℒᎯℙℋℐℰℒ 
I didn’t know there was such thing as “music theory”.
It would be like trying to treat art and poetry as science and math.
Pomegranates :P
@Broken Adam
The main thing anyone needs to know about music theory is that 95% of music breaks the “rules” of music theory.
I didn’t know there was such thing as “music theory”.
It would be like trying to treat art and poetry as science and math.
Meanlucario 
Time to get spooky
@Selaphiel
I don’t know, how many cats do you see cleaning up their mess instead of their owner?
I don’t know, how many cats do you see cleaning up their mess instead of their owner?
Don't
Get up and Jump
@Selaphiel
That’s actually a huge problem in Art and Music schools where a lot of them are too focused on the Technical aspect without teaching people to find their own style
I understand why Art school encourages starting out with photorealism because it improves other styles, the problem is that way too many art schools teaches that Photorealism is the only “Vaild” form of art and everything else is low brow.
That’s actually a huge problem in Art and Music schools where a lot of them are too focused on the Technical aspect without teaching people to find their own style
I understand why Art school encourages starting out with photorealism because it improves other styles, the problem is that way too many art schools teaches that Photorealism is the only “Vaild” form of art and everything else is low brow.
ЅℰℒᎯℙℋℐℰℒ
Pomegranates :P
@Broken Adam
They only teach established genres and skim over some of their principles.
It’s just like how architecture schools only seem to teach modern architecture these days. While over a century ago, it was all Neo-Classical stuff.
They only teach established genres and skim over some of their principles.
It’s just like how architecture schools only seem to teach modern architecture these days. While over a century ago, it was all Neo-Classical stuff.
Background Pony #C85F
True indeed. However, there comes a point where illustrations don’t fit into either the realism nor classicism/stylized ways, and thus aren’t fit to be legitimately called art. Examples: Anything by Jackson Pollock, modern minimalist works, and (maybe) cubism.
@Selaphiel
That’s actually a huge problem in Art and Music schools where a lot of them are too focused on the Technical aspect without teaching people to find their own styleI understand why Art school encourages starting out with photorealism because it improves other styles, the problem is that way too many art schools teaches that Photorealism is the only “Vaild” form of art and everything else is low brow.
True indeed. However, there comes a point where illustrations don’t fit into either the realism nor classicism/stylized ways, and thus aren’t fit to be legitimately called art. Examples: Anything by Jackson Pollock, modern minimalist works, and (maybe) cubism.
DerpyFast
If something works, there’s usually a reason beyond “the person who made it is just a wizard.” I’m self-taught, but learning theory made me an objectively better composer.
I think people hate things like music theory because it clashes with a romanticized idea of what talent and creativity are like.
I didn’t know there was such thing as “music theory”.
It would be like trying to treat art and poetry as science and math.
If something works, there’s usually a reason beyond “the person who made it is just a wizard.” I’m self-taught, but learning theory made me an objectively better composer.
I think people hate things like music theory because it clashes with a romanticized idea of what talent and creativity are like.
Don't
Get up and Jump
@DerpyFast
People hate theory because way too many people who learn it end up seeing it as “Rules” rather than a theory and thus kill their own creativity
@Background Pony #7524
Cubism is art
People hate theory because way too many people who learn it end up seeing it as “Rules” rather than a theory and thus kill their own creativity
@Background Pony #7524
Cubism is art
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!