Viewing last 25 versions of post by ЅℰℒᎯℙℋℐℰℒ in topic Vent thread

They don't care about "the childrenz". They never did.
 
Despite the fact the FTC themselves even offered better more moderate approaches to the problem, POOgle insisted on this Draconian approach.


 
There's no reason to not suspect they expected and intended for this to happen. So they can have an excuse to assert more control over their platforms.

O
 
If any of you still think social justice isn't a big pretentious authoritarian scam. WAKE THE FUCK UP! They are not for you! But for themselves.

They don't care about "the childrenz". They never did.
Despite the fact the FTC themselves even offered better more moderate approaches to the problem, POOgle insisted on this Draconian approach.

IThere's no reason to not suspect they expected and intended for this to happen. So they can have an excuse to assert more control over their platforms.

Of any of you still think social justice isn't a big pretentious authoritarian scam. WAKE THE FUCK UP! They are not for you! But for themselves.

They don't care about "the childrenz". They never did.
Despite the fact the FTC themselves even offered better more moderate approaches to the problem, POOgle insisted on this Draconian approach.

I suspect they expect and intended for this to happen. So they can have an excuse to assert more control over their platforms.

Of any of you still think social justice isn't a big pretentious authoritarian scam. WAKE THE FUCK UP! They are not for you! But for themselves.

They don't care about "the childrenz". They never did.
Despite the fact the FTC themselves even offered better more moderate approaches to the problem, POOgle insisted on this Draconian approach.

I suspect they expect and intended for this to happen. So they can have an excuse to assert more control over their platforms.

Of any of you still think social justice isn't a big authoritarian scam. WAKE THE FUCK UP! They are not for you! But for themselves.