@Background Pony #3F29
@saby
There’s also the issue that bringing on more volunteers takes more time for the existing volunteers to manage.
With any organization, there’s a balance point where you have enough people to get the work done, but not so many that keeping it all coordinated becomes unmanageable.
It’s like when people bring on more developers to speed up a coding project. By the time the new coders are integrated and you’ve broken up the project so more coders will help, odds are you would have finished the project anyway. And at some point the new coders themselves create so much overhead to the project that all you’re doing is going to meetings now.
I think the term for it is the ‘Brooks’s law’ problem. 9 women can’t have a baby in 1 month.
In practice, bringing a new person on for DNPs took several days. Maybe weeks. In the same time I could have gotten a couple dozen or more DNPs done by myself. But in doing so we have two people who are kind of experts in the DNP process and can handle the most complex or messy DNPs, and we have documented the process so anyone on staff with the necessary tools can help.
Long term, it’s great. But short term it actually takes more time.
2LDR: Even after all the vetting is done, adding more people and getting them integrated and up to speed with the tools is itself a pretty big effort.