You laugh, you lose.
Badumsquish
ᗡ: 📶 📡
@Teslakana
I gotta know if my logic is stupid or not. Is it 2, and is it how many ovals are in each set of numbers…? D:
I gotta know if my logic is stupid or not. Is it 2, and is it how many ovals are in each set of numbers…? D:
SuperSupermario24
fluffy sylveon
@Teslakana
…
i don’t get it
EDIT:
@Badumsquish
oh god dammit that’s what it is
yeah that looks exactly right
…
i don’t get it
EDIT:
@Badumsquish
oh god dammit that’s what it is
yeah that looks exactly right
Flying Pancake
@Badumsquish
Wait, that’s how you’re supposed to do it? I went the long way around and did systems of equations with the left side numbers as variables.
Wait, that’s how you’re supposed to do it? I went the long way around and did systems of equations with the left side numbers as variables.
The★Rickmeister
Stormlight Archivist📔
@Flying Pancake
No he’s right, it’s the amount of ovals/circles in each set of numbers.
No he’s right, it’s the amount of ovals/circles in each set of numbers.
SuperSupermario24
fluffy sylveon
@SuperPinkiePie64
That is perfect. Especially the grin on the person in 2nd place.
@Flying Pancake
…So basically you got the right answer by dumb luck. Unless whatever you did is somehow reducible to counting the number of circles/ovals in the numbers.
Also, I guess the intro at the top actually sorta makes sense now; people with higher math education are less likely to be focusing on the shapes of the numbers as opposed to their actual values.
That is perfect. Especially the grin on the person in 2nd place.
@Flying Pancake
…So basically you got the right answer by dumb luck. Unless whatever you did is somehow reducible to counting the number of circles/ovals in the numbers.
Also, I guess the intro at the top actually sorta makes sense now; people with higher math education are less likely to be focusing on the shapes of the numbers as opposed to their actual values.
Flying Pancake
@SuperSupermario24
It does reduce, just without me realizing it. I made the (questionable) assumptions that each digit on the left was a single variable, and they were being added together. So, 0000=4 becomes 0+0+0+0=4 and then 4*0=4, meaning 0=1.
Then I repeated that process for all the digits in 8809 and 2581, which meant 2581=0+0+2+0=2.
So, the method works, the answer’s right, but I didn’t understand the concept at all. That about sums up my experience with math in general, come to think of it.
And I get the preschoolers part now, but why were programmers mentioned?
It does reduce, just without me realizing it. I made the (questionable) assumptions that each digit on the left was a single variable, and they were being added together. So, 0000=4 becomes 0+0+0+0=4 and then 4*0=4, meaning 0=1.
Then I repeated that process for all the digits in 8809 and 2581, which meant 2581=0+0+2+0=2.
So, the method works, the answer’s right, but I didn’t understand the concept at all. That about sums up my experience with math in general, come to think of it.
And I get the preschoolers part now, but why were programmers mentioned?
SuperSupermario24
fluffy sylveon
@Flying Pancake
Ah, so you correctly determined the “value” of each digit, just not why they were those values.
Ah, so you correctly determined the “value” of each digit, just not why they were those values.
Crow
Senior Moderator
Caw
How The Last Jedi Should Have Ended
The porg watching Chewbacca part makes so much sense; the porg just wanted some food, not for Chewie to discard the already cooked meal.
The porg watching Chewbacca part makes so much sense; the porg just wanted some food, not for Chewie to discard the already cooked meal.
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!