Humans have a very skewed risk calculus if you really think about it.
Ask people if killing 30 mook-level terrorists with a strike that kills one civi is worth it and they’ll say take the shot without missing a beat. Regardless of how easily replaceable those mooks are, and how little damage it’ll actually do to the greater whole. The number on the left is higher than the number on the right, so it’s worth it.
Ask them if killing 30 civis to take out the big second in command without which the organization may tetter on oblivion and you’ll get a lot more umming and ahhing.
I’ve done this with a few people. And this example can be extrapolated to other, more mundane areas of life.
It shows that people rarely consider the inherent value of an action as much as they claim too. More numbers is just more good, end of the story for them.