Uploaded by Background Pony #AFE7
720x720 PNG 262 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2164867 +-SH edit172175 +-SH scootaloo58612 +-SH pegasus492572 +-SH pony1592756 +-SH g42017157 +-SH cutie mark51311 +-SH disabled242 +-SH female1792371 +-SH filly96808 +-SH op is a duck4862 +-SH scootaloo can't fly562 +-SH solo1417886 +-SH we are going to hell772 +-SH word of faust243
Loading...
Loading...
Cope
@Background Pony #4435
QUACK QUACK
Well, guess what? That’s also against the rules. You don’t get off on the technicality of not saying you’d do it yourself.
Now, if you want to complain and say you know the rules better than the ones who write them further, take it to the forums or you will get a ban.
Edited
I have not talked about that I want to do that and neither about doing it.
I said that it’s something that should be done, not that I do it myself.
Which is something you know, of course, that’s the reason why you suddenly deleted the comment after I just sent a message to zippysqrl about something else, which means I can’t prove anymore how I really said it.
Coincidence that you deleted it now after you let it be there for weeks? I don’t think so.
Anyway, your accusations hold no ground, as I was saying nothing of that sort. How much you try to construe my comment in favor against me, in the same fashion zippysqrl already tried further down with another comment of mine, doesn’t matter.
I never said I want to behead him.
For anything else, I’m quoting myself again:
Edited because: Rule #7
Wanting to behead someone isn’t rule-breaking.
Talking about wanting to do it or talking about doing it is.
Edited
Quoting myself:
Edited because: Rule #7
Also very against the rules (Rule #0 for being a jerk, Rule #7 for talking about brutal murder, which is grimdark, without spoilering it).
And rule #2 would be broken too if he actually tagged it. What’s crazy is that someone else broke rule #2 for him.
Edited
Threatening murder over being offended at a picture on the internet?
Real nice.
…yeah, you’re the kind of fan that “normal” people get weird about.
I was only saying that I would like it to see how he would act that way, with a disability, and if he would find it funny then too, because having to experience that for himself would make him realize that this is nothing funny at all, which is a thought-provoking impulse not a wish that this ill fate befalls him, so it is not breaking Rule #0.
First statement, which is rather a substitute term for “he should get punished for making this” to express my anger about the insulting picture than an actual expression that I would behead him if I should meet him (one would think that’s obvious), is the way I think about it and my opinion, so it isn’t rule-breaking either.
Saying the
duckeditor of this pic deserves to be beheaded, and that you want Ferrotter to be handicapped him/herself for finding this funny, might have something to do with the mod’s comments.Just a thought.
I never said she isn’t. I know it and that’s why I answered you, because your comment came across like you think that’s funny.
I see. You should have made this more clear.
Still nothing funny about a picture that makes it look like being disabled is her special talent, though.
Except it’s meant to make fun of bronies who only think she’s a good character as long as she has her disability and that she’s going to be a bland character if she should ever learn to fly, because sadly, those exist.
Also, please alert me if my comments towards you contain anything flaming or angst-inducing and if there is any form of “personal attacks, racial, sexual or religious discrimination, use of racial or homophobic slurs or other abusive content” in them that I can’t see because I’m apparently too stupid to know when I answer to someone to flame him.
Because according to zippysqrl down there, I’m breaking Rule #0 very hard right now by not being “excellent” to you, with having you asked what is so funny about Scootaloo having a disability and having you criticized for that supposed notion.
EVERYTHING!
at what point did the show say she was handicapped?
It’s like using the Windows XP wallpaper for Applejack.
Scootaloo IS handicapped. That’s just a show-canon fact. There’s nothing funny about it; actually it’s rather touching that they’d make such an endearing handicapped character.
What’s funny is this picture representing that she’s handicapped (which is a very peripheral part of who she is) by using the universal “handicapped” symbol as her cutie mark, when a cutie mark is supposed to represent the most important part of who you are.
who doesn’t?
also, i’d like to state that at one time she said that “scoots simply doesnt know how to fly yet”
faust and the fandom, sitting in a tree; p-a-n-d-e-r-i-n-g
well, fuck.
i lost my sides, thanks for the laugh.
You seem to enjoy breaking rule 0.
What is so funny about Scootaloo having a disability? I want to see you that way.
nice one op.
+1